OK, as things stand then it would seem that the preferred option is to
restructure using Rob's suggestion.
Unless we get lots of votes to the contrary, I'll do the restructuring
tomorrow evening GMT (Mon 27th). If you have any files you are working
on, please make sure you've checked them in by then).
Thx
Dan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 25/06/2011 19:41, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1 for Robs suggestion. I think the examples will be release dependent to some
extent.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 6/25/11, Dan Haywood<[email protected]> wrote:
From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: moving examples and domain-libs out of trunk
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, June 25, 2011, 5:31 PM
OK, well, if the preference is to
make larger-scale changes, then I think there are two main
options.
Either (as Rob suggests):
trunk/
framework/
examples/
domain-libs/
tags/
framework/
examples/
domain-libs/
branches/
framework/
examples/
domain-libs/
or:
framework/
trunk/
tags/
branches/
examples/
trunk/
tags/
branches/
domain-libs/
trunk/
tags/
branches/
For myself I marginally prefer the latter, because I see
the framework, the examples and the domain-libs as being
separately release-able; and in general any set of modules
that might have its own release lifecycle ought to have its
own trunk/tags/branches pair.
Does anyone else have any opinions on this?
Mentors... what do other Apache projects that you contribute
to do?
Thanks
Dan
