On 13 December 2011 19:36, Kevin Meyer - KMZ <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's the compound data types that might be more challenging, which is > why I'm not going to support them (e.g. Money, which requires 2 fields > in the SQL object store). > as a cheap-and-cheerful first-cut, you could just save them as strings using the EncodableFacet. This is how the XML object store works, if I recall. > > > I'm slowly working towards v0.2.0 (site stuff etc); do we think this is > > something we'll want to release in 0.2.0? > > > In short, it'll be nice, but don't let it hold you up. > okee dokee. Dan
