Also out of being curious why closing this issue :) ? I think we need to discuss the value of that integration and if not needed we then close the issue as won't fix ?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Dan Haywood (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Dan Haywood resolved ISIS-222. > ------------------------------ > > Resolution: Won't Fix > > indeed, gonna close this as 'wont-fix' since no work been done on it. > >> Integration with Apache EmpireDB >> -------------------------------- >> >> Key: ISIS-222 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-222 >> Project: Isis >> Issue Type: New Feature >> Components: Runtimes: Dflt >> Reporter: Mohammad Nour >> Priority: Minor >> Labels: empiredb, isis,, objectstore >> >> - It would be nice to EmpireDB to abstract different objectsore operations >> - How exactly should that be not yet defined >> - More details later > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
