Yeah, I think it would make sense. I've created ISIS-273 [1] for this idea.
Don't intend to work on it myself, but worth capturing, I think. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-273 On 25 September 2012 10:56, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Maybe you're right that is not enough for just Lombok. > > However in one of the project goals I read something about Isis support > for other JVM languages. In that case it might make sense to have support > for annotations on fields as well. > > What do you think? > > Regards, > > Minto > > > > Quoting Dan Haywood <[email protected]>**: > > On 22 September 2012 11:18, Minto van der Sluis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> PS. Regarding code formatting I prefer my own formatting (me being >>> stubborn ;-) which is consistent over my isis and not isis projects. But >>> thanks for the tip anyways. To reduce boilerplate (getters and setters) >>> I mostly use Lombok. >>> >>> >>> Interesting. I did a blog post on Lombok a while [1] (the screencast >> link >> now seems to have died, oh well). But one thing that prevents us from >> really reducing boilerplate with Lombok (unless you know better?) is that >> Isis searches for annotations on the getters, not on the fields. >> >> I guess it'd be easy enough to enhance all of the FacetFactories to search >> for their annotations on the field as well as on the getter. Is Lombok >> used enough to justify the effort, though, I ask myself? >> >> Cheers >> Dan >> >> >> [1] >> http://danhaywood.com/2009/09/**13/using-project-lombok-with-** >> naked-objects/<http://danhaywood.com/2009/09/13/using-project-lombok-with-naked-objects/> >> >> > >
