Ketan - Thanx for the comments. I think we do want to allow MSD support for values other than imposition values. We will revise the text so we are not restricted to only imposition cases.
Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 1:51 AM > To: Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07 > > Hello, > > I support this document and would like to ask the authors and WG to > consider if we can expand the scope of this draft to not just "imposition" of > the SID stack but also other similar limits related to other actions (e.g. > reading, processing, etc.). With Segment Routing, we are coming across > various actions that nodes need to do with the SID stack for different > purposes and IMHO it would be useful to extend the MSD ability to cover > those as they arise. > > Thanks, > Ketan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Isis-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian > Hopps > Sent: 20 December 2017 14:03 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07 > > > The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/ > > which will last an extended 4 weeks to allow for year-end PTO patterns. > > An IPR statement exists: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-isis- > segment-routing-msd > > Authors please reply to the list indicating whether you are aware of any > *new* IPR. > > Thanks, > Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Isis-wg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg _______________________________________________ Isis-wg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
