Let Syariah Court deal with issue 

Tuesday, 19 June 2007, 07:49am
©The Star (Used by permission)
Ikim Views by Dr Wan Axhar Wan Ahmad

ALL the hue and cry prior to and after the Federal Court's judgment in the Lina 
Joy case are manifestations of ignorance, arrogance and sheer defiance of 
logic. It once again proves that the most unsettling problem afflicting our 
people is the problem of knowledge. 

It's alarming to encounter certain individuals or groups of people are ignorant 
of their ignorance and yet are bold enough to indulge in matters alien to their 
understanding. To further exacerbate the confusion, they choose to remain 
obstinate by discarding authority, i.e. true knowledge and erudite scholarship. 
As was adjudicated in the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Federal 
Court, the case of Lina Joy is primarily administrative in nature. It 
essentially deals with the question of conversion procedure - whether or not a 
Muslim has to obtain a decree from the Syariah Court confirming one's apostasy. 

A lot of people appear to consciously reject the fact that this country 
practices a dual legal system of parallel status - civil and syariah. This 
unique system is sanctioned, among others, by the Ninth Schedule and further 
bolstered by Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution, the supreme law of 
the country. 

When it comes to matters pertaining to Islamic law, they must be referred to 
the Syariah Court, as it is the main body entrusted with administering justice 
according to the confines of Islam. 

Conversion out of Islam is part of Islamic law, and therefore the Syariah Court 
is the only proper platform to resolve the issue. It is hard to believe that 
some people simply refuse to deal with the Syariah Court, assuming that justice 
will be denied. 

The law is simple and straightforward. There is no need to complicate matters 
by manipulating the issues to the extent of threatening national unity. If one 
is not happy with any decision of any subordinate Syariah Court, then one may 
appeal. But some seem to already admit defeat without even trying. 

It is amazing to learn that segments of our learned citizens throw their 
allegiance to a "foreign" law as compared to our readily available own internal 
legal provisions. 

It is well and good to acknowledge the superiority of the United Nation's 
Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 (UDHR) over our Federal 
Constitution, namely with regard to the freedom of religion. 

But it appears to run foul if one were to make the same recognition, say, with 
the provisions of holy scriptures: the Bible, the Vedas, and particularly the 
Quran and Sunnah. 

Many do not realise that in adopting any international document, we must first 
examine if it is binding. The UDHR is not legally binding even in countries 
which have agreed to adopt it. 

Furthermore, in the Malaysian context, section 4(4) of the Human Rights 
Commission Act 1999 clearly provides that the application of any external laws 
must be filtered through the Federal Constitution. 

Certainly, apostasy is currently the hottest issue at stake; it is an internal 
legal problem. Like it or not, in order to resolve the issue, we must first 
acknowledge and apply all rules and laws available in our own backyard. The 
so-called international law only plays a persuasive role that may be referred 
to as a guide, not the determining factor. 

One must not approach apostasy strictly from its constitutional or civil legal 
perspective alone. Religious representation must be given, if not more, at 
least an equal consideration. 

In the case of Muslim apostates and those who support them (especially fellow 
Muslims), it is inconceivable that they would willingly leave Islam or give 
tremendous support if they properly understood the religion of Islam. 

This holds true even to the followers of other religions. One will only 
renounce one's own religion as a result of utter ignorance, frustration or 
disenchantment. 

First and foremost, Muslims must understand that they have chosen Islam 
consciously and willingly as a result of understanding and knowledge. Even 
Muslims cannot take things for granted believing that they are Muslims simply 
by birth. 

All Muslims, either by birth or by conversion, must be made to realise that 
they have actually entered into a primordial covenant with God in the 
supernatural realm long before they were born to this world. 

And this divine contract, i.e. the pledge of recognition, trust and allegiance 
between all human souls and God, is recorded in the Quran, namely, in Surah 
al-A'raf (7): 172. 

This recognition and trust needs to be observed accordingly. In fact, this is 
the very foundation where all aspects of human life originate. None can ever 
claim that he/she is not aware of this spiritual contract, as the Quran is the 
reminder. 

Therefore, once a Muslim breaches this divine contract, he is subject to a 
certain kind of religious remedial measure or punishment. This situation is 
very similar to that of commercial transactions where, for instance, those who 
breach contracts are punished in accordance with the terms and conditions 
stipulated in their agreements. 

In the case of the Islamic legal system, there are provisions available 
pertaining to apostasy. If a crime takes place, then all parties involved are 
required to abide by them. In fact, every aspect of life, including the issue 
of freedom, has to be understood and exercised within the framework of 
religious parameters. 

Certainly, the availability of fixed rules and regulations do not negate the 
possible and necessary modifications in the manifestations of justice according 
to Islam. 

One of the substantial differences between Islam and the other religions is 
that, the latter possibly do not speak of a divine primordial covenant. This 
explains why the question of leaving one's religion for another is never an 
issue in non-Islamic religious traditions. 

Muslims must not become Muslims simply because they are born within Muslim 
families or societies. For the converted Muslims, the motivation must not be 
for personal gain, be it in the form of marriage or other socio-economic and 
political benefits. 

It is never too late to rectify any wrong once it is discovered. Gradually 
he/she must make efforts to increase his/her knowledge about Islam. In this 
regard, other Muslims, especially the loved ones (husbands, wives, parents, 
etc.), or those responsible for the conversion, must assist him/her along the 
way. 

With proper understanding of religion, one will not easily leave religion for 
mundane reasons. A lack of compassion on the part of the Muslims will perhaps 
stifle any attempt to call the other to Islam. 

Dr Wan Axhar Wan Ahmad, Senior Fellow/Director, Centre for Syariah, Law and 
Political Science, Ikim.

Kirim email ke