|
Public Sector Financing in Islamic Framework
Shah Abdul
Hannan*
Before I discuss the issue Public Sector Financing under Islamic framework, I want to discuss about the Fiscal System in Islam in general. Now, by Fiscal system we mean two policies. One is the tax regime of the country or the taxation system of country. The other is the expenditure policy of the country. In other words, how revenue is realized and how revenue is spent. This is the matter of discussion under the Fiscal system. I would discuss about the taxation regime in the modern time in an Islamic
system.
It is true that in early Islam the tax regime was not very big. Initially
there
was only land tax or what we call Kharaj and there was later, at
the time of Omar-Al-Faruque,
custom duty was introduced on imports and exports. So this was a very simple tax system. There was also revenue from state properly like the state owned mines or forests. Then there was Zakat and Ushr. But this was not the part of the general taxation. This was a part of we can say welfare taxation. The purpose of zakat and ushr is not to meet the general expenditure of administration or for construction of the roads and highways. The purpose of zakat and ushr is for poverty alleviation or eradication and not general purpose. So these were the heads in the beginning and the government was also not very complex at that time. The administration was small and money realised from these heads was enough to meet the expenditure of that time. History has not recorded any fiscal deficit or crisis. However, I must mention here that the administration is now very complex
and we require much more revenue. So this came up in the Fiqh literature or in the juristic literature, whether the government can tax other than those which were imposed in the early days of Islam and the consensus is now that the government can impose any tax that is necessary for the country for its development. Any body can look into the book of Dr. Yusuf-al-Qardawi Fiqhluz Zakat in Arabic (in Bangali Islamer Zakat Bidhan) where he has dealt the question at length over a hundred page and he has concluded that the general consensus is that the state is empowered to impose whatever taxes are needed. However they have emphasized that there should not be unjust taxes. The govt. should remember, while taxing, that there should not be any unjust taxation or such heavy taxation which people cannot bear. But this is a relative issue, subjective issue. What is heavy and what is necessary is a mater of judgement for the Govt. and the Parliament who pass the budget. Others can criticise but can not make judgement. This is the reality of the situation. For this it is my submission that taxes in Islamic state now will be more or less same. Like any other state we shall have the custom duties, income taxes, value added taxes (VAT) or sales tax. So the tax regime in an Islamic state will not be very different except
that the Islamic govt. is likely to be of honest and public minded people. As for the expenditure policy which is the other part of the fiscal system, Islamic state will be more prudent and careful of the rights of the people. It is an obligation under Islam that the need of all people should be fulfilled. The state is under an obligation to fulfill the needs of all people and poverty must be eliminated. So, there will be more emphasis on elimination of poverty than the current time or there will be more emphasis in reduction of poverty and also need fulfillment of the needs of people. The demand of justice is that before you meet the luxuries of the rich people, you meet the need of all people. I understand that in a private sector driven economy the production will be
free and the market will be free. But even than the govt. policies like monetary policies and the fiscal policies and the banking policies will be fully geared to fulfillment of the needs of the people before the luxuries of the rich are fulfilled.This should be done mostly by policies rather than direct intervention in the market. Now coming to the topic, public sector financing under Islamic framework I
would first submit that it will depend on what we mean by public sector and what will be the size of public sector. If we take the case of Bangladesh, now i.e. the end of 2004, then I will say that public sector is gradually going to be a small sector. Most of the industries are in private sector and govt. is gradually withdrawing from the industry and commercial activity. Recently Adamjee Jute Mill has been closed and now another dockyard has been closed. I believe that the public sector enterprises will be gradually sold out or closed down. So the public sector size will be small in so far as industries and commercial activities are concerned. But I think public sector size will be considerable in communication (ports, highways). I believe in the long run public sector role in education will be less though it is very big now. But I think education will go to private sector in the long run like other countries. May be, that govt. scholarship program will increase. But owning of all schools, colleges and universities is not the appropriate policy for the government as far as I understand from the scenario of the last thirty-forty years. In this connection, I would mention that whereas there are only 15 or 20 govt. sector universities, there are already about 52 private universities. Now, how to finance? Whatever the size of the public sector, how to finance
the expenditure of the public sector? I believe that the financing has to be made essentially from the revenues of the govt., by raising taxes and expanding it wisely. It would not have any unnecessarily big administration so that the revenues are not spent mostly on paying salaries and the allowances or the facilities of officers and staff. In any event we have to finance from the revenues. Second I believe that a part of the expenditure has to be met from foreign loan. I am not for taking too much loan. I believe that the foreign aid is a trap to make the countries slave. A new political and economical imperialism is emerging. One or two countries are trying to dictate the
whole
world, because most of the countries are in debt. This is a new kind
of slavery- debt slavery,
you can call it. The only way to get out of it is not to depend on foreign
aid or
foreign assistance or loan. May be for countries like Bangladesh, it would be difficult in one day but we should make a policy. Let us eliminate the need for foreign assistance over ten years. If we reduce every year our foreign aid need by ten percent, then dependence on foreign aid we can eliminate within ten years. So this is what is important to achieve, this will require serious political commitment of the govt. to do it. If we can increase export every year by 10% in the next 10 (ten) years and reduce our expenditure to somewhat, we can get rid off foreign aid. So I would say that for the public sector financing, I dont suggest to get
foreign aid or foreign assistance. We have to depend on revenue. May be, part of the finance have to be done by the high powered money created. We know every year Central Bank creates new money or what we call high powered money . The Central Bank can give this money free in stead of giving on interest to the govt. They can take only a service charge from the government for this. This money can be used by the govt. in financing the public sector project and particularly the poverty alleviation program. This money can be also given as Mudarabah advance to financial institutions to finnance special
sectors. Even if loss is sustained against this finnance, there should not be
much concern as the original money is created money , not receipt from
taxation.(Ref. Dr umer Chapra , Towards A Just Monetary System, published by
Islamic Foundation, UK, 1990,
pp.194-206). This can be helped very seriously if the govt. with the consent of the top Ulema of the country launches a program for zakat collection on a obligatory basis, particularly in the countries where it is politically acceptable. At least effort should be made. So that those who are hard core poor like the widows and disabled without any financial support or the orphans can be taken care of by the zakat money. I would like to suggest that govt. can raise Islamic bonds also on Mudarabah basis and the money can be used partly helping the Islamic Banks to tide over monetary problem, partly in financing those projects of the government where it is possible under profit sharing arrangement. I feel that if the govt. follows prudent policy of avoiding wastes and
mis-expenditure, I dont find any difficulty in public sector financing under Islamic framework. Hard core poverty cannot be eradicated by micro-credit loans. They are simply unable to make a living out of a small loan and also pay back. They require grant like Zakat or a combination of grant cum loan program. I want to clarify at the end that there will not be any special tax
on
Non- Muslims like Zizia in the past.This was symbol of obedience
to the state and this is being expressed by all citizens by paying
different kind of taxes.
This is also the view of the great jurist of the current age Dr. Yousuf
Al-Qaradawi. He mentions that Umar bin Al-Khattab, the 2nd Khalifa of Islam on the request of the Christians of Banu Taglib dropped 'zizia' and imposed another tax (as at that time there was no other modern tax payable by all). Dr Monzer Kahf during discussion in the seminar Zakat and Poverty
Alleviation in Bangladesh held during December 14-15, 1998 in Dhaka, mentioned that Zizia is not relevant in the modern states as these are not conquered territories rather these states have been established by the joint struggle of the Muslims and non-Muslims. Syed Abul-Ala Maududi has also stated in his book "Rasail Wa Masail" (Vol. IV, page 158, Bangladesh Edition published by Syyed Abul Ala Maududi, Maududi Research Academy, Moghbazar, Dhaka) in response to a question on rights of Non-Muslims that Zizia is applicable only in case of citizens of conquered territories and not applicable to the non-Muslim citizens of country like Pakistan . * Former Secretary, Government of Bangladesh.
*************************************************************************** {Invite (mankind, O Muhammad ) to the Way of your Lord (i.e. Islam) with wisdom (i.e. with the Divine Inspiration and the Qur'an) and fair preaching, and argue with them in a way that is better. Truly, your Lord knows best who has gone astray from His Path, and He is the Best Aware of those who are guided.} (Holy Quran-16:125) {And who is better in speech than he who [says: "My Lord is Allah (believes in His Oneness)," and then stands straight (acts upon His Order), and] invites (men) to Allah's (Islamic Monotheism), and does righteous deeds, and says: "I am one of the Muslims."} (Holy Quran-41:33) The prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: "By Allah, if Allah guides one person by you, it is better for you than the best types of camels." [al-Bukhaaree, Muslim] The prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) also said, "Whoever calls to guidance will have a reward similar to the reward of the one who follows him, without the reward of either of them being lessened at all." [Muslim, Ahmad, Aboo Daawood, an-Nasaa'ee, at-Tirmidhee, Ibn Maajah] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended: http://www.islamonline.net http://www.islam-guide.com http://www.prophetmuhammadforall.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in any way reflect the official views of IslamCity unless sanctioned or approved otherwise. If your mailbox clogged with mails from IslamCity, you may wish to get a daily digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the title "change to daily digest".
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
