Americans Have Lost Their Country             
                                                                            by 
Paul Craig Roberts                                                              
                               The Bush-Cheney regime is America's first 
neoconservative    regime. In a few short years, the regime has destroyed the 
Bill of Rights, the    separation of powers, the Geneva Conventions, and the 
remains of America's moral    reputation along with the infrastructures of two 
Muslim countries and countless    thousands of Islamic civilians. Plans have 
been prepared, and forces moved into    place, for an attack on a third Islamic 
country, Iran, and perhaps Syria and    Hezbollah in Lebanon as well.
 This extraordinary aggressiveness toward the US Constitution, international    
law, and the Islamic world is the work, not of a vast movement, but of a 
handful    of ideologues – principally Vice President Dick Cheney, Donald 
Rumsfeld, Lewis    Libby, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliott 
Abrams, Zalmay    Khalilzad, John Bolton, Philip Zelikow, and Attorney General 
Gonzales. These    are the main operatives who have controlled policy. They 
have been supported    by their media shills at the Weekly Standard, National 
Review,    Fox News, New York Times, CNN, and the Wall Street Journal editorial 
   page and by "scholars" in assorted think tanks such as the American    
Enterprise Institute.
 The entirety of their success in miring the United States in what   could 
become permanent conflict in the Middle East is based on the   power of 
propaganda and the big lie.
 Initially, the 9/11 attack was blamed on Osama bin Laden, but after   an 
American puppet was installed in Afghanistan, the blame for 9/11   was shifted 
to Iraq's Saddam Hussein, who was said to have weapons of   mass destruction 
that would be used against America. The regime sent   Secretary of State Colin 
Powell to tell the lie to the UN that the   Bush-Cheney regime had conclusive 
proof of Iraqi weapons of mass   destruction.
 Having conned the UN, Congress, and the American people, the regime   invaded 
Iraq under totally false pretenses and with totally false   expectations. The 
regime's occupation of Iraq has failed in a   military sense, but the 
neoconservatives are turning their failure   into a strategic advantage. At the 
beginning of this year President   Bush began blaming Iran for America's 
embarrassing defeat by a few   thousand lightly armed insurgents in Iraq.
 Bush accuses Iran of arming the Iraqi insurgents, a charge that   experts 
regard as improbable. The Iraqi insurgents are Sunni. They   inflict casualties 
on our troops, but spend most of their energy   killing Iraqi Shi'ites, who are 
closely allied with Iran, which is   Shi'ite. Bush's accusation requires us to 
believe that Iran is   arming the enemies of its allies.
 On the basis of this absurd accusation – a pure invention – Bush has   ordered 
a heavy concentration of aircraft carrier attack forces off   Iran's coast, and 
he has moved US attack planes to Turkish bases and   other US bases in 
countries contingent to Iran.
 In testimony before Congress on February 1 of this year, former   National 
Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski said that he expected   the regime to 
orchestrate a "head-on conflict with Iran and with much   of the world of Islam 
at large." He said a plausible scenario was "a   terrorist act blamed on Iran, 
culminating in a 'defensive' US   military action against Iran." He said that 
the neoconservative   propaganda machine was already articulating a "mythical 
historical   narrative" for widening their war against Islam.
 Why is the US spending one trillion dollars on wars, the reasons for   which 
are patently false. What is going on?
 There are several parts to the answer. Like their forebears among the Jacobins 
   of the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks of the communist revolution, and 
the    National Socialists of Hitler's revolution, neoconservatives believe 
that they    have a monopoly on virtue and the right to impose hegemony on the 
rest of the    world. Neoconservative conquests began in the Middle East 
because oil and Israel,    with which neocons are closely allied, are both in 
the Middle East.
 The American oil giant, UNOCAL, had plans for an oil and gas pipeline   
through Afghanistan, but the Taliban were not sufficiently   cooperative. The 
US invasion of Afghanistan was used to install Hamid   Karzai, who had been on 
UNOCAL's payroll, as puppet prime minister.   US neoconservative Zalmay 
Khalilzad, who also had been on UNOCAL's   payroll, was installed as US 
ambassador to Afghanistan.
 Two years later Khalilzad was appointed US ambassador to Iraq.   American oil 
companies have been given control over the exploitation   of Iraq's oil 
resources.
 The Israeli relationship is perhaps even more important. In 1996   Richard 
Perle and the usual collection of neocons proposed that all   of Israel's 
enemies in the Middle East be overthrown. "Israel's   enemies" consist of the 
Muslim countries not in the hands of US   puppets or allies. For decades Israel 
has been stealing Palestine   from the Palestinians such that today there is 
not enough of   Palestine left to comprise an independent country. The US and 
Israeli   governments blame Iran, Iraq, and Syria for aiding and abetting   
Palestinian resistance to Israel's theft of Palestine.
 The Bush-Cheney regime came to power with the plans drawn to attack   the 
remaining independent countries in the Middle East and with   neoconservatives 
in office to implement the plans. However, an   excuse was required. 
Neoconservatives had called for "a new Pearl   Harbor," and 9/11 provided the 
propaganda event needed in order to   stampede the public and Congress into 
war. Neoconservative Philip   Zelikow was put in charge of the 9/11 Commission 
Report to make   certain no uncomfortable facts emerged.
 The neoconservatives have had enormous help from the corporate media, from    
Christian evangelicals, particularly from the "Rapture Evangelicals,"    from 
flag-waving superpatriots, and from the military-industrial complex whose    
profits have prospered. But the fact remains that the dozen men named in the    
second paragraph above were able to overthrow the US Constitution and launch    
military aggression under the guise of a preventive/preemptive "war against    
terrorism."
 When the American people caught on that the "war on terror" was a   cloak for 
wars of aggression, they put Democrats in control of   Congress in order to 
apply a brake to the regime's warmongering.   However, the Democrats have 
proven to be impotent to stop the   neoconservative drive to wider war and, 
perhaps, world conflagration.
 We are witnessing the triumph of a dozen evil men over American democracy and  
  a free press.
              
                            
 
---------------------------------
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.

Reply via email to