Assalaamu 'alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh,
   
  That site quoted from -Allahuakbar.net does Islam a disservice. It attacks 
pretty much anyone and everyone. No one is perfect - whether individual or as a 
jama'ah. Some individuals in one jama'ah may be from one extreme and others at 
another extreme. However the bulk of Muslims know what is from Ahlus Sunnah. 
But to attack scholars, teachers, da'ees without giving them an oportunity to 
respond is nothing but Buhtaan (slander). So these people who run this site - 
even if their intentions are of a good nature - are not really doing any khayr. 
It would be better for them to focus on teaching what really will lead to ones 
salvation - which is to focus on ones own sins and to rectify that, and to try 
and abstain from the innvations, and people who take them away from Allah 
subhaanahu wa ta'ala and into the hands of Shaytaan la'natAllahi 'alayh.
   
  I am neither a Salafi, nor  Sufi, nor a ikhwaani, nor a Tableegji nor a 
Jama'ati, but I am a Muslim, I follow Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah - and this can 
be in any Jama'ah - as long as one does not go to extremes of Ifraat and 
Tafreed - but balances their zawiya and takes things from the middle way, and 
leaves that which leads to confusion. I have been to all these groups, and 
frankly - a jama'ah is not a sect, but some people seem to label each other as 
this sect or that sect, and this is the illness of our times. If you truly 
benefit from a jama'ah, then continue - as it's better to be with the group, 
than to be alone in the hadns of the devil.
   
  May Allah subhaanahu wa ta'ala help us all. Ameen ajma'aeen.
   
  Fi Amanillah
   
  Abu Khadijah
   
  P.S. Maududi may have made mistakes, so too would Sayed Qutb and others, but 
they have passed away - and yet we are here acruing either hasanaat or sayyiat 
- if their works are not good - then that is enough to say - nothing further. 
No one has a monopoly over Haqq - and by having a site dedicated to 'exposing' 
others, does not clarify the site administrators standing in the community - 
infact it makes them look even more divisive than certain groups!

[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
          Dear Malhar,
 
I do appreciate your comment on Mr Abu Ala Maoudidi. 
 
May I Know if who is the best scholar in the contemporary world to be followed.?




    
---------------------------------
  To: [email protected]
From: 
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:42:52 +0530
Subject: RE: Bismillah [IslamCity] Maulana Maudoodi and Indian Muslims --a 
brief note by Kaukab Siddique

          http://www.allaahuakbar.net/jamaat-e-islaami/maududi/index.htm
   
  Abu A`la Maududi  
This is a man who reviled many of the Prophets of Allaah and the Companions of 
Allaah's Messenger as well as promoting un-Islamic revolutionary modes of 
thought.
Regarding Abul A'la Maudoodi's rejection of the Dajjaal
Who was Abul Alaa Maududi? 
A brief history of the Maududi calamity
  May Allah save us from Misguidance!
  Malhar
   
  -----Original Message-----
From: "S A Hannan"@mgw.lankabell.com [mailto:"S A Hannan"@mgw.lankabell.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 1:35 PM
To: eGroup For Muslims Around The World
Subject: Bismillah [IslamCity] Maulana Maudoodi and Indian Muslims --a brief 
note by Kaukab Siddique
   
          Dear sirs,

     

    Assalamu alaikum.Please read this response from an erudite scholar to whom 
I referred a question posted in internet against Sayyid maududi.

     

    Shah abdul Hannan

     

    Maulana Maudoodi and Indian Muslims
a brief note by Kaukab Siddique
 
     A distinguished Bangladeshi brother, S. A. Hannan, has asked  me to 
comment on some abusive attacks on Maulana Maudoodi [rahmatullah alaih] 
published on line on several discussion groups.
 
Syed Abul 'Ala Maudoodi was undoubtedly among the greatest Islamic scholars of 
the 20th century  c.e. He taught the Muslims of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh 
to understand the relevance of Islam to our times in rational and scientific 
terms. His contributions to Islamic learning in our times are simply too many 
to be listed. Suffice it to say that the modern Islamic movement at least in 
South Asia would have been unthinkable without him.
 
This does not mean that he should not be criticized. He wrote to me: "I have 
never considered myself above criticism." He wanted Muslims to pick up from 
where he had left and to carry on his work, and not to come to a stop as if he 
is the last word.
 
However, criticism to be legitimate has to be honest. If stories are fabricated 
about him, or his writings are taken totally out of context, that cannot be 
considered criticism. That is abuse and propaganda. I am not surprised that 
some people have an irrational hatred of Maudoodi. He was not only a scholar 
but the leader of an organized and disciplined Islamic movement. Thus he was 
able to challenge the enemies of Islam on a daily basis. He was repeatedly sent 
to prison and the Pakistani media for decades would not mention the fact that 
he  even existed, in a futile effort to stop the spread of his ideas. He had 
well placed enemies among a variety of groups who opposed the emergence of an 
Islamic view of life.
 
For the specific issue under review, remember that Maudoodi was himself an 
"Indian Muslim" though he became a leader of international dimensions. In the 
three volumes of Musalman awr Maujuda Siyasi kashmakash, he criticized the 
movement for Pakistan while he provided the idea of Pakistan and the Pakistan 
movement all its ideological tools. His contention was that the strategic issue 
is not Muslim nationalism but the emergence of a viable Islamic political 
state. If Pakistan emerges and it is not Islamically structured and does not 
provide Islamic justice, he thought, it would jeopardize not only its own 
existence but that of the Muslims of India too.
 
He wrote that for him one square mile of land governed by the Law of Allah was 
more important than all of India. Obviously such writing can be taken out of 
context and used against him. The Pakistani secularists claim that he was 
against Pakistan. It's a ridiculous claim for one who knows the writings of 
Maudoodi and in any case becomes merely a part of historical polemic when one 
realizes that Maudoodi and Jamaate Islami fought for the independence and 
ideology of Pakistan as no other group did.
 
Many of the Muslims of India cherish Maudoodi's ideological writings and those 
who read him know that he was unflinching in his support of India's Muslims 
even after he left India. Islam is not a national religion and Maudoodi was not 
a national leader.
 
The person you have quoted is not a scholar or even a known person. He is 
quoting out of context from Dr. Israr [an intellectual pygmy as compared to 
Maulana Maudoodi]  and the Munir Report written by a bunch of secularists who 
supported the "Ahmeddi" [Qadiani] sect and wanted to sentence Maudoodi to death 
for his x-ray study of the fake Qadiani religion.
 
The person you quote has evidently not studied anything written by Maudoodi and 
is picking up quotes from here and there.
I had the honor of reading all his books. I then translated and put together a 
selection of his writings which I  titled Come Let Us Change this World. I 
remember strolling with him in the little garden in front of his office as he 
looked at and approved the manuscript of this book. Here is a quote from this 
book which criticizes Muslims and lead him to be hated by narrow nationalists 
and racists:
 
    "The nation known as Muslim today has forgotten, and by its conduct has led 
the world to forget, the fact that Islam actually is the name of a movement 
which started with a purpose and some principles. And the word 'Muslim' was 
meant for the group which followed this movement and went forward with it. The 
movement has been lost sight of. Its purpose has been forgotten. Its principles 
have been broken one after the other and its name, having lost all its 
significance, is now merely used to denote racial and social allegiance. So 
much so that it is used even on occasions where the very purpose of Islam is 
negated, where its principles are demolished and where, instead of Islam there 
is all that is not Islam." [Muslaman awr Mawjuda Siyasi Kashmakash, Part II, 
pp. 40-41.] [p.88 of my translation]

I hope you are doing well in Dhaka. I love Bangladesh. I visited several times 
and will visit again, inshallah.


  



This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised 
copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly 
forbidden. 










  
---------------------------------
  Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. 
It's easy! Try it!   

                           

       
---------------------------------
Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.

<<image/gif>>

Reply via email to