A colleague once told me of a hospital that had designed a state-of-the-art 
multifaith room with funds from donors of the various faith communities in 
Toronto. The walls of the room were etched with the names of donors, few of 
whom were Muslims. And yet, he said, Muslims were the ones who used the space 
most often. There is much to admire of those individuals who are able to 
recognize the worth of the communities within which they live and are willing 
to lend their support in whatever way possible. If only Muslims would compete 
with the ‘yahood’ in this way.

If we wish to compete then we have a lot of work to do. In a piece last year 
dealing with some of the issues or challenges faced by ‘religious 
philanthropy’, Philanthropy Magazine noted the scope of Jewish giving:

Two studies, both conducted in recent years but with different methodologies, 
show that Jewish philanthropists contribute the overwhelming majority of their 
dollars to universal, rather than Jewish, organizations and causes. In 1998, 
professor Jack Wertheimer studied the 232 foundations in America that 
self-identified as giving at least $200,000 to Jewish causes. He found that 
even these foundations gave nearly two-thirds of their annual funding, $487 
million, to non-sectarian causes. Similarly, a 2003 report by Dr. Gary Tobin 
and colleagues at the Institute for Jewish and Community Research examined the 
865 philanthropic gifts of $10 million or more made by all American donors 
between 1995 and 2000. While nearly 25 percent (188 gifts totaling $5.3 
billion) were made by Jews, the Jewish mega-givers made fewer than 10 percent 
of their gifts to Jewish or Israeli organizations. While these two studies do 
not represent the full panoply of Jewish giving, most
 of which is by individuals giving much less than $10 million, it seems likely 
that the data capture the overall thrust of giving by Jews.
In Australia, Australian Jews have also been at the forefront of charitable 
giving. Organisations such as the Pratt Foundation, Smorgan Family Foundation, 
Besen Family Foundation, and others, have contributed millions to health, 
education and social welfare issues in this country. It takes only a casual 
walk through any of our major hospitals or universities to see that the 
contribution of Australian Jewry has been profound: the life of all Australians 
has been enriched by the presence of Jews in Australia. This is, of course, to 
say nothing of the equally profound intellectual contribution that Australian 
Jews have made to academia.
The reasons for Jewish philanthropy are well outside the scope of this piece, 
but perhaps one of the reasons is that Jews recognised, after centuries of 
persecution, that one of the most important bulwarks that they have against a 
repeat of past atrocities is to become active and valued members of the 
society; members whose contribution and commitment are beyond question. When so 
much of the infrastructure in a country owes itself to the kindness of its 
Jewish minority, it would be difficult for some demagogue to make the case that 
Jews are a ‘threat’ that must be eliminated.
Interestingly, the author of the article referenced above suggested that the 
traditional Jewish philanthropic focus on ‘universal causes’ may be to the 
detriment of issues specific to the Jewish community.

As we noted earlier, only a small proportion of Jewish philanthropy currently 
flows to Jewish causes. Since nearly half of even this limited amount is sent 
abroad (much of it to Israel), the resources available for Jewish needs in 
America are minimal. If Jews today were more literate in their own traditions 
and more successful in transmitting Judaism to future generations, then the 
meagerness of charitable contributions for Jewish religious life, especially 
Jewish education, would not matter as much. Sadly, the needs dramatically 
exceed the available funding.
Muslims — at least, Australian Muslims — don’t face such a dilemma. Our 
philanthropic contribution to this country has, in comparison, been rather 
meagre. With few exceptions, one cannot recall any major fundraising effort for 
a ‘universal cause’. However, in recent months, local groups have held 
fundraising campaigns for everything from the families of some recently arrest 
terrorism suspects to Egyptian orphans to building a mosque in the outer 
suburbs of Melbourne to feeding poor Somalians. When it comes to giving, the 
locus of concern for Australian Muslims seems to be ourselves — and, if not 
ourselves, then our co-religionists abroad.
Is this a good thing? There are certainly good arguments for why Muslims should 
also give towards projects that benefit the wider society: it demonstrates that 
we are part of that society and share the same concern for bettering our 
community; and we are ultimately working towards things that benefit us as 
individuals, such as the extension of medical facilities or the development of 
education institutions. At the same time, there are arguments to be made that 
the Muslim community is a young and relatively weak community and that its 
charity should be spent closer to home in developing institutions and 
infrastructure.
There needs to be a balance: we should continue to fundraise for meaningful 
causes within our community, but, at the same time, Muslims need to also work 
on projects that have a benefit that extends beyond our ghettos and 
co-religionists. Whilst we have been moderately successful with the former, we 
have not done nearly enough with the latter. In fact, it could seem to some 
observers that Australian Muslims are more interested in taking than we are in 
giving anything meaningful back to the society that has given us sanctuary, 
comfort and opportunity.
Charity is just one part of a bigger picture. We should, as a community, ask 
ourselves: is Australia better off by virtue of our presence here? If we were 
to assess the total contribution of Muslims to every aspect of this country, 
can we honestly say that Australia would be poorer intellectually, culturally, 
economically and spiritually if we were suddenly removed from the face of this 
earth?
Unfortunately, if we don’t start asking ourselves these sorts of questions 
soon, other people will be asking (and answering) them on our behalf.
 
http://austrolabe.com/2006/06/26/a-muslim-philanthropic-culture/


saiyed shahbazi
www.shahbazcenter.org

Reply via email to