Dear Friends
Though I hate to write on this mailing list but let me put the record
straight;
1. A General Body Meeting on Royalty was called by ISPAK in Karachi.
2. Members present in that meeting collectively decided that they want
highest level of representation and as such a committee was constituted
by that General Body which comprises of following
PRESIDENT ISPAK
V.P North
V.P South
The committee earlier formed by Mr. Bhutta thus stood null and void.
3. RIGHTLY or WRONGLY but it was collectively decided by all present in
meeting that;
(a) We wanted a final resolution to Royalty Issue as most of us felt
that it is a sword hanging on our heads with undecided faith.
(b) A 1% royalty figure mandate was given to the Committee.
(c) At all cost we wanted a resolution.
Here I would also like to put it on record that Mr. Bhutta was not very
willing to go to Islamabad for this meeting but again all present forced
him to lead the Group.
4. The Committee came back with 1.5% Royalty i.e. 0.5% higher than the
mandate given BUT later on they were able to persuade the concerned
quarters to consider reduction of PTCL dues...... This reduction may
tends amount to almost less than 1% of net Royalty (our earlier mandate
to the Committee).
5. Nobody, HAD, CAN or WILL be able to take away the constitutional
right of any person who decided the legal course of action...........
NOW WHAT IS THE DISPUTE ?
6. To me the ugly situation of rift in ISPAK was not ROYALTY but the
mare fact that fewer of us just want a critics on others, I felt deeply
hurt when I saw the mail by one of our dear colleague hurting again
while the other member trying to apologize for nothing done on his part.
7. Atleast I for one would not like to see Arshad Jalil taking the blame
of something he never did.
Best Regards
Naveed A Khan
Asif Luqman Qazi wrote:
>
> Dear Arshad Jalil Sb,
>
> Thank you for the explanation. We all want to remain
> united in one ISPAK, but do you sincerely think that
> we can remain united when genuine licensed,
> operational ISPs are told to keep away even from
> attending meetings. ISPAK affairs are all messed up
> and you know the reason better than me. This is being
> run as a Sole Proprietorship rather than an
> association. We would have allowed Bhutta Sb to do
> whatever he wishes but any decision taken at his end
> effects all ISPs' business. You have been a consistent
> supporter of Bhutta Sb and I think you can make him
> understand better.
>
> Regards,
> Asif Luqman Qazi
>
> --- Mohammad Jalil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Mr. Sanaullah Bhutta and ALL respected ISPAK
> > members,
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Precedence: bulk
> >
> > I would like to thank you personally for the kind
> > words, ISPAK is a collective eforts of all the
> > members and whatever we are today it is purely
> > because of dedicated and sincre efforts of all the
> > members. WHERE WE WENT WRONG, basically in my
> > opinion it was the royalty issue primarily and the
> > way we handled the issue was the main reason for the
> > begining of the rift and which formed two groups in
> > ISPAK.
> >
> > President ISPAK nominated four persons for
> > discussion with the honorable Minister, however few
> > Karachi members strongly suggested that President
> > ISPAK alongwith myself should attend the meeting in
> > Isalamabad as the matter was very serious and they
> > wanted an IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT.
> >
> > I have earlier apologised to Mr. IMRAN A. Shah and
> > Mr. Naeem for the inconvenience caused to both of
> > them and I again accept FULL responsibility that
> > instead of FOUR members ALL SIX should have atended
> > the meeting with MOST. I hope they will forgive us
> > for mishandling of the nominations.
> >
> > In all sincrety we have been able to reduce the
> > Royalty amount substantially, I also feel that due
> > to strong opposition from few of our members from
> > North on Royalty issue we further renegotiated and
> > obtained additional reduction which is going to
> > benefit everyone and all credit for this achievement
> > goes to members who refused to accept 1.5% on gross.
> >
> > I would like to advise you ALL that I will be happy
> > to accept the role of Election Officer and will like
> > to conduct the elections and ISPAK will be managed
> > by the NEW elected representatives. I will
> > therefore will not be contesting and will like to
> > assist ISPAK as an ordinary member. I would like
> > you all to remain united as OUR UNITY IS OUR
> > STRENGTH.
> >
> > I thank you all once again and my sincre thanks and
> > prayers for Mr. Sanaullah Bhutta who has tried his
> > best, as we are all human being so is Mr. Bhutta. I
> > would also like to apologies from all the members if
> > any earlier email or actions have hurt them. I will
> > be back InshaAllah in two weeks and will see you all
> > soon.
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > A. Jalil
> >
> > sbhutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > GRATITUDE
> >
> >
> >
> > We are highly obliged, thankful and indebted to our
> > honourable members who contributed to ISPAK
> > Rs.50,000/-
> > Other than registration and annual renewal fee for
> > smooth functioning of ISPAK during 2000. as follow:-
> >
> >
> > 1. Muhammad Arshad Jalil COL. Karachi
> > 2. Mr.Naeem Haq Nexlinx. Lahore
> > 3. Mr.Ansar ul Haq Cyber.net
> > Karachi
> > 4. Mr.Faisal Ahmad Fascom
> > Karachi
> > 5. Mr.Shahid Mehmood Alvi.
> > Brain.net. Lahore
> > 6. Mr.Zahid Haleem WOL Lahore although
> > he is not EC member.
> >
> > It was decision of EC that each EC members should
> > pay Rs.50000/- in advance to meet the expenses of
> > ISPAK from the account of Rs.10/- per port.
> >
> > The following member was also responsible to pay
> > this amount but they failed to pay , more over some
> > have not yet renewed their membership.
> >
> > 1. Sanaullah Bhutta Napcom.
> > 2. Mr.Asif Luqman Qazi POL.
> > 3. Mr.Imran Akhtar Shah. Descon.
> > 4. Mr.M.Ishaq Malik Shoa.
> > 5. Mr.Naveed Khan Sat.net
> > 6. Mr.Imran Qureshi Cyberaccess
> > 7. Mr.Tariq Pardesi Digicom
> > 8. Mr.V.A.Abdi Hi.net
> > 9. Mr.Wahaj ur Siraj Comsats.
> > 10. Mr.Jamal Nasir Super.net.
> >
> > SPECIAL GRATITUDE
> >
> > We are highly thankful to Mr.Muhmmad Arshad Jalil
> > who supported to ISPAK by providing office and staff
> > .He paid salaries from his on pocket to ISPAK staffs
> > for two years. He allowed 50% reduction in air
> > ticket to ISPAK members on Shaheen Air
> > International.He arranged lot of meeting for ISPAK.
> > He forced and managed the present offcie.
> >
> > We are also obliged to Mr.Faisal Ahmad , Mr.Ansar ul
> > Haq , Mr.Shahid Mehmood of Brain.net and Mr.Naeem
> > Haq of Nexlinx , who morally and financially
> > supported to ISPAK by hosting different meetings and
> > dinners and lunches to ISPAK guests. Mr.Imran Akhtar
> > Shah worked hard and also provided us office
> > facilities of WOL in Islamabad
> >
> > Mr.Salman Ansari services will remain alive forever
> > in building the image of ISPAK. It is his baby.
> >
> > The services of Mr.Wahaj ur Siraj are remarkable.
> > His efficient working forced to PTA and PTCL to
> > accept our demands. Mr.Ahmad Nadeem Syed talented
> > working and support to get reduction in tariff and
> > royalty in excellent, all achievements are due to
> > his hard working and marathon negotiations with PTCL
> > and PTA. Mr.Mahmood Baweja of Napcom who provided us
> > free facilities of meeting in Regent Plaza Hotel and
> > provided office. Mr.Tahir Choudhry of Zooom.net
> > beared all expenses of early office in Islamabad.
> > Mr.Asif Luqman Qazi and Mr.Ishaq Malik contributed
> > their shaer in hosting lunch for PTA on Open Fourm.
> > Mr.Imran Qureshi is still spending time to lookafter
> > the account and other matters. Each and every member
> > has contributed and there was no rift prior the
> > introduction of tariff of STM-1.
> >
> > The list of achievements is very long ( I will ask
> > to Mr.Pasha for circulation of list of achivement)
> > and ISPAK has a history of hard working, history of
> > unity and team sprits. If we will remain unite we
> > can achieve more if we will loose unity we will
> > loose all achievements. I am unable to under stand
> > why rift is being created. ISPAK always welcome to
> > volunteers for their support and to represent ISPAK.
> > If some one desire to contribute to ISPAK he will be
> > most well come. Mr.Imran Shah urged to work so he
> > represented in all committees. He was autorised to
> > send letter on my behalf to PTA and PTCl and sent
> > countless letters. All the time we hunted talented
> > people for development of ISPAK. We published
> > advertisement . "WANTED TO WORK FOR ISPAK"
> >
> > Now ISPAK has become an identity and forceful forum
> > of ISPs so some people desire
> >
> > to capture it. ISPAK is always in-need of sincer
> > hard workers come and join to work like Mr.Jamal
> > Nasir Mr.Nasir Qureshi. It is a histry of unity
> > .Please forgive me if I have mised services of any
> > other members.
> >
> > What has happend with us now we are fighting with
> > each other for paid and non paid , tariff of annual
> > fee , memebrs and offical and non -offical meeting.
> > May there be my fault please forgive me.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Sanaullah Bhutta
> >
> >
> > ------------------------- ISPAK
> > --------------------------
> > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to
> > officials of
> > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media
> > representatives.
> > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk
> -----------------------
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
> ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
