This policy was drafted in agreement with PTCL and their staff. There are no two points. It now only requires to be made official.
Regards, Jamal salman ansari wrote: > Has anyone matched the policy issued by the PTCL with what you guys are > debating? > Salman > > -----Original Message----- > From: Naeem Haq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:40 PM > To: Jamal Nasir Khan; A.R. Nasir Qureshi > Cc: ISPAK; Salman Ansari > Subject: RE: ISPAK: Peering Policy > > Jamal , > > I agree with you on all points but would like to add a couple of points . > > a) Private Peering arrangements can be of different nature and thus > sometimes static > routing gives additional control . We should not argue on this point and > make the policy > flexible enough to accomodate most situations . > > b) Peering and Media > > PTCL must allow the use of Non-Exchange pairs for local exchange peering ; > this will > make the peering more meshed , economical and not to mention provide an > alternative to > PTCL DXX . Additonally , the policy should be clear on use of private media > . > > Naeem Haq > NEXLINX > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jamal Nasir Khan > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:44 AM > To: A.R. Nasir Qureshi > Cc: ISPAK; Salman Ansari > Subject: Re: ISPAK: Peering Policy > > Nasir, > > Please call me so that I can explain you on both points. > > My numbers are 5871864 & 0320-4236688 > > Regards, > > Jamal > > "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" wrote: > > > I have two points. > > > > You mentioned Static Routing. I strongly oppose use of any static routes > > in any peering arrangment. > > > > Secondly, I do not see any reason for PTCL to have two AS numbers. One AS > > can work with any type pf peers, and technically speaking in a peering > > arrangement, there is no difference between International Peers or > > National Peers. Managing two AS's will only complicate matters. Cisco BGP > > implementation by default does not allow use of two AS numbers. > > > > Regards, > > > > Nasir. > > > > On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Jamal Nasir Khan wrote: > > > > > Following is the draft of the Peering Policy required to be reviewed, > > > finalized and issued by MoST/ PTCL. Please send your comments, > > > suggestions if any by tomorrow morning in order to finalize the subject. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jamal > > > > > > > > > Peering Policy > > > > > > > > > * Peering is the arrangement of traffic and routing information > > > exchanged between Internet Service Providers. > > > * > > > * Peers are Internet Service Providers and Data Network Operators who > > > hold a valid license. > > > * > > > * Peering Point is a place where the routing entries and the traffic > > > is exchanged. > > > * > > > > > > Types of Peering > > > > > > *Public Peering > > > > > > Public Peering is an arrangement where ISPs are connected to a central > > > point and exchange Internet traffic and routing information according to > > > a standard and general policy. Any consortium of ISPs can form a public > > > peering point. The policy and SOP related to operate Public Peering > > > Point must be a public document. Each Public peering exchange may have > > > independent set of policy and procedures. > > > > > > *Private Peering > > > > > > Private Peering is an arrangement where two ISPs are connected to each > > > other and exchange Internet traffic and routing information according to > > > their own defined and agreed policies. > > > > > > *Interconnect > > > > > > All Public Peering points will be required to interconnect with each > > > other. The circuit required for Interconnect will be based on 50% split > > > charges borne by the two public peering point operating companies or > > > consortium. Routing information of the interconnected public peering > > > points will be exchanged. > > > > > > Role of PTCL: > > > > > > * > > > * PTCL will arrange public peering for all circuits, which are > > > connected to Pakistan Internet Exchange. > > > * All Customers who will have the full circuit IP based International > > > circuit from PTCL will have the public peering facility available > > > free of cost through that circuit. > > > * PTCL will provision a separate circuit based on separate tariff for > > > the connectivity to the Public Peering Point based on PIE. This > > > circuit will enable the customer to exchange traffic only on the > > > National IP backbone with the participating ISP members on the PIE. > > > Their will only be a single tariff will be based on the port speed: > > > * > > > o Local Link bandwidth ( DXX Charges Recurring ) > > > o Hardware Cost ( One Time ) > > > o Inter-city Link charges ( Recurring Fractional Charge ) > > > o Operation & Maintenance Cost ( Recurring ) > > > * > > > * PTCL will provide the leased circuit / media based on the > > > applicable / available tariff to any two ISPs who wants to peer > > > with each other privately. ( Only DXX charges applicable ). > > > * The link between the two ISPs can be provisioned with the help of a > > > radio link provided by DNOP. > > > * PTCL will provide the leased circuit / media based on the > > > applicable / available tariff to any ISP / DNOP who wants to peer > > > with some other Public Peering Point not operated by PTCL. > > > * Any other operating public peering point can connect to any ISP / > > > DNOP through radio link as well provided by DNOP. > > > * PTCL will arrange interconnection between all Public Peering Point > > > based on available media. The interconnection charges will only be > > > based on applicable / available tariff of the standard leased > > > circuits. > > > * PTCL will exchange traffic with member Peer ISPs and International > > > Bandwidth customers with the help of Static Routing and BGP. > > > * PTCL will have two separate Autonomous Systems Numbers to decipher > > > between the International Link Customers who will be acting as > > > transit peers and the national peer members. > > > > > > > ------------------------- ISPAK -------------------------- > > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of > > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives. > > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk ----------------------- > > ------------------------- ISPAK -------------------------- > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives. > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
begin:vcard n:Khan;Jamal Nasir Khan tel;cell:92-320-4236688 tel;fax:92-21-5871869 tel;work:92-21-5871864-7 x-mozilla-html:FALSE adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x-mozilla-cpt:;-4432 fn:Jamal Nasir Khan end:vcard
