TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
the amount of data on the console shouldn't be a problem. it's nice to see
what's going on... but one can't look on it all the time.
it's more irritating making all of them show on the console, bcoz a console
restart or mass sensors disconnection.
-eli
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris H Mahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 2:26 PM
> To: Hall, Suzanne (Contractor)
> Cc: 'Alfonso Farje'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Number of Sensors monitored from a single Real
> Secure console (Wo rkGroup Manager)
>
>
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of
> your message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help
> with any problems!
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>
>
> I'm sorry, did you say 50? Are you talking host sensors or
> network sensors
> or a combination? My understanding is they recommend no more than 15
> sensors, which is just about right.
>
> I'm using network sensors, and when I start getting near 15
> sensors on a
> console it gets to be too much information. I have know idea
> what 50 would
> look like.
>
>
> Chris Mahn
> Duke Energy IT Security Services
> 704 382-8072
> "Protecting What We Generate"
>
>
>
>
> "Hall, Suzanne
>
> (Contractor)" To: "'Alfonso
> Farje'"
> <halls@ritchie
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .disa.mil> cc:
>
> Sent by: bcc:
>
> owner-issforum Subject: RE:
> Number of Sensors monitored
> @iss.net from a single Real
> Secure console (Wo
> rkGroup Manager)
>
>
>
> 05/15/01 07:36
>
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of
> your message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
> problems!
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>
>
> ISS has recommended to us that we monitor no more than 50 sensors per
> console. You can do more, but 50 seems to work well.
>
> Suzanne Hall
> DSN 570-9830
> Comm (717) 267-9830
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alfonso Farje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 3:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Number of Sensors monitored from a single Real Secure console
> (Wo rkGroup Manager)
>
>
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of
> your message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
> problems!
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>
>
> Hello all,
> I know that the number of devices that can be supported from a single
> console depends on the traffic that the sensors are listening but, in
> average, does anybody know there is a recomended maximun
> number of devices
> that can be monitored from a single console?
>
> Does anybody monitor a big number of Network Sensors from a
> single console.
>
>
> I only want to monitor 15 Network Sensors and 50 Server Sensors on a
> relatively noisely 100 Mb network, burt the number of sensors
> could grow in
> a short period of time. Please any idea?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Alfonso R. Farje Tong
> Ingeniero e-Security
> Cosapi Soft S.A.
> We Secure the Internet
> Av. Javier Prado Este 4491 Surco
> Telef: (511) 3133200, Anexo 233. Cel: (511) 81.22609
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
