Does this mean that ISS customers using the ISS supplied Apache server should NOT download and install the current Apache binary, but rather should wait for the ISS version?
Will there be a difference in the code? Or, is the reason just regression testing on the part of ISS? -- Regards, Sid Witzer Citigroup/CGTI/GSO/DCRM/High Availability Systems "Cloonan, John (ISS Cincinnati)" wrote: > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any problems! > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Sid, > We are in the process of testing a Vista upgrade to 1.3.26. It is expected > this will be available first part of next week. > > thanks, > John > > *********************************************************************** > John Cloonan > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Technical Product Manager > Internet Security Systems > Office: (513) 936.8364 > Mobile: (513) 200.7828 > Fax: (707) 202.3912 > > http://www.iss.net > > Internet Security Systems -- The Power to Protect > *********************************************************************** > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sidney Witzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Apache Bug > > Advisory: > > The Apache version included on my distribution cd from System > Scanner Vista was 1.3.17. > > There is both a 1.3.26 upgrade and a 2.0.36 release available. > Either version will fix the current bug, BUT the version 2 release > IS NOT backward compatible with third party add-ons. > > If you are updating your software, be sure you take the right > version off the distribution sites. > > -- > Regards, > Sid Witzer > Citigroup/CGTI/GSO/DCRM/High Availability Systems
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
