TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stephen, we've recently become aware of an issue with the import policy
function and are working diligently to correct it. There should be a fix
available shortly, either in the next X-Press Update or as a stand-alone
patch. More details will be available next week.

Thanks for your patience.
--Jordan

=====================
Jordan Blake - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Product Manager
Network Protection Solutions
Internet Security Systems - The Power to Protect
=====================

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Realsecure 6.5 - 7.0 No policy migration path?


TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Things have moved on a bit since my last post

ISS support (thanks Nathan) have determined that a policy has been
tainted by XPU 4.4, or Console Update 3.1 (which comes from 6.5 XPU 4.4
/ 7.0 XPU 20.1), the following  happens

You can import the policy, but when it is pushed to a 7.0 sensor, all
user settings are preserved (UDEs, CE, Packet Filters), but, the stnadrd
security checks /decodes/attacks and audits part of the policy is
mangled, for example out of say 40-50 backdoor decodes, the new policy
has 5 backdoor decodes.

Now I am stuck, how does one untaint the policy? Anyone got any ideas?
(I even tried unistalling XPU 4.4 and saving the active policy to a
console that had never had Console Update 3.1)

Stephen

>>> "Richard Culshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday 04, July, 2002
00:55:43 >>>

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your
message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi there,

what I found I could do was derive a new policy based on one of the old
policies.  The new policy would be 7.0 compliant but it would have most
of the 6.5 settings including the filters etc. that you had set...  That
way you can migrate all the old settings basically

FYI


Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, 3 July 2002 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Realsecure 6.5 - 7.0 No policy migration path?



TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your
message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am having massive problems trying to import my NT based Network
Sensor 6.5 Policies to my new W2K Network Sensor 7.0 systems.

SiteProtector cant do it at all, it simply rejects my old policies when
trying to apply them to V 7 sensors.

The WorkGroup Manager sort of imports it, but applies the policy to the
7 sensor as if its a 6.5 sensor and you see no new decodes.

I cant believe there is no migration path and I have to recreate my NS
7 policies from the beginning. Has anybody had the same experience, or
advice they can offer?



Stephen Cooper, CISSP
Senior Security Analyst
Security & Architecture Group
Information Technology Services
Bank for International Settlements
Voice: +41 61 2806792
Fax: +41 61 2809100




DISCLAIMER: Any e-mail messages from the Bank for International
Settlements are sent in good faith, but shall not be binding nor
construed as constituting any obligation on the part of the Bank.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains confidential information,
which is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately via e-mail and return the entire message. Thank you for your
assistance.








Reply via email to