I was doing the test and i found the same, i used and switch CNET and the
sensor did not hear any, but i change it for hub and it works good.

Claudia Prada

-----Original Message-----
From: jaeson pilicon [mailto:hz6146@;yahoo.com]
Sent: Viernes, 01 de Noviembre de 2002 07:36 p.m.
To: Claudia Patricia Prada G; Nelson Fernando Aranzazu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ISSForum] Network Sensor can't capture events


Dear all,

Thank you very much for your kindly attention.
But actually, all your suggestion had been tested by
me in previously, but all fail.
I think that the problem my be on switch.  Because if
I replace by hubs, it can be trigger all correct
event.
So do you have any idea on switch?

thanks,
Jaeson

--- Claudia Patricia Prada G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> try it:
>
>
> 1. on the deployment wizard use 127.0.0.1
> 2.  the NIC without net address set a IP address
> whatever without GW
> 3. open the Realsecure, and monitor with the NIC
> using whatever IP
> 4. after you see the traffic, stop the sensor set
> the NIC on sthealt mode
> 5. start the sensor
>
>
> CP
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:issforum-admin@;iss.net]On Behalf Of
> jaeson pilicon
> Sent: Viernes, 01 de Noviembre de 2002 12:28 p.m.
> To: Nelson Fernando Aranzazu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ISSForum] Network Sensor can't capture
> events
>
>
> Dear Nelson,
>
> The IOS is "12.0(5.3)WC(1)" , Switch Model is
> "C2900XL)".
>
> I think that it cannot trigger the events with
> connection events policy if no implement port
> mirroring.  But it can't recongize this packets as a
> correct pattern, all this tcp packets will be show
> as
> a "suspicious tcp".
>
> Do you have any idea?
>
> thanks again,
> Jaeson
>
> --- Nelson Fernando Aranzazu
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jaeson,
> >
> > What kind of switches do you have IOS or CatOs?
> >
> > From your abstract, I think you should implement
> > some kind of
> > remote-port-mirroring (RSPAN) in switch B, because
> > it doesn&#30936; have port
> > mirroring enabled and for example right now switch
> A
> > isn't able to know if
> > there are traffic between two ports in switch B.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "jaeson pilicon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Nelson Fernando Aranzazu"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ISSForum] Network Sensor can't
> capture
> > events
> >
> >
> > > Dear Nelson,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your reply. Yes, I had done this
> > "hme1"
> > > settings.  Do you have any idea?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > Jaeson
> > >
> > > --- Nelson Fernando Aranzazu
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Jaeson
> > > >
> > > > Did you configure hme1 for promiscous mode?
> > > >
> > > > If you didn't, try this one:
> > > >
> > > > /usr/sbin/ifconfig  hme1  plumb   -arp   up
> > > >
> > > > Regards.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "jaeson pilicon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:29 AM
> > > > Subject: [ISSForum] Network Sensor can't
> capture
> > > > events
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dear all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I use NS sensor 6.5 on solaris 2.8 platform
> > with
> > > > > Stealth-mode, but it can't capture any
> events
> > and
> > > > > display on WGM.
> > > > >
> > > > > The detail settings/Scenario as follows:
> > > > > 1. One Network Sensor 6.5 on Solaris 2.8
> > platform,
> > > > >    - "hme0" adaptor connect to WGM
> > > > >    - "hme1" adaptor as a monitoring
> interface
> > > > without
> > > > >      ip address
> > > > > 2. Workgroup Manager 6.5 install on W2k
> > machine
> > > > >    (had applied the lastest XPU & database
> > patch)
> > > > > 3. Monitoring interface connect to Cisco
> 29xx
> > > > switch
> > > > >    (Port Monitoring had been done on Cisco
> > switch)
> > > > >
> > > > > Diagram:
> > > > >
> > > > >     Internal Network
> > > > >         |
> > > > >         |
> > > > >     Cisco Switch (B)
> > > > >         |
> > > > >         |(trunking)
> > > > >         |
> > > > >     Cisco Switch (A)
> > > > >         |
> > > > >         |(Port Monitoring)
> > > > >         |
> > > > >      [Stealth Mode]- hme1
> > > > >      Network Sensor 6.5
> > > > >         |
> > > > >         |
> > > > >      Working Manager 6.5
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My Testing:
> > > > > 1. Connect a Notebook on Cisco Switch(A) and
> > > > perform a
> > > > >    "port scan" attack.  NS sensor 6.5 can be
> > > > captured
> > > > >
> > > > >    this attack and display on WGM console.
> > > > [success]
> > > > > 2. But if connect a Notebook on Cisco Switch
> > (B)
> > > > and
> > > > >    perform a "port scan" attack.  NS sensor
> > 6.5
> > > > cannot
> > > > >    be captured this attack [Fail]
> > > > > 3. Then I try to make a "connection events"
> > policy
> > > > to
> > > > >    capture all TCP events.  NS sensor 6.5
> can
> > be
> > > > >    captured this event, but it's not show as
> a
> > > > "port
> > > > >    scan" attack.  It's show this event as a
> > > > (suspicous
> > > > >    tcp).
> > > > >
> > > > > I appreciate that if you can give me any
> > > > suggestion.
> > > > >
> > > > > thank you,
> > > > > Jaeson
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
> > > > > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
> > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > ISSForum mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002

_______________________________________________
ISSForum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to