I find the reporting in IS to be less than useful. At this point, I just 
pull down the MDB file to my workstation and run my own set of 
queries/reports within MS Access. And yes, we're also stung by the fact 
that many checks require admin rights. In most environments, this is 
probably not at all realistic. We've been really hampered in our 
vulnerability management efforts by this. 

I understand that different customers have different needs, but rather 
than making a decision that just caters to one side, it would be far 
better if both options were available so that those of us "on the ground" 
can make the decision that best suits our environments: Can't risk a DoS? 
Run the check that requires admin rights (or don't run the check). Risk is 
acceptable? Run the check that actually goes out and *tests* the problem 
at hand.





"Stephen Tihor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/28/2003 05:19 PM

 
        To:     "Peterson, Brent  (ISS Atlanta)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc:     Kyle R. Maxwell/EMPL/TX/Verizon@VZNotes, "Rouland, Chris (ISSAtlanta)" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Stephen 
Tihor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "ISS XForce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Subject:        RE: [ISSForum] ISS Security Brief: Microsoft SQL Slammer Worm 
Propagation



That is very good news. Of course that does not help us with all the other
checks which are useless in the non-admin rights world. 

What ever happened to my suggestions/request some time back about
includinginformationon how a check gets its results (versions tring test, 
actual symptom test, login as admin and read registry, etc?) and some 
pointers
on how to validate the many false positives we see? 



We have been looking at scanning tools which provide all the info ISS does 
plus
give details on what was seen and how it implies the problem and give 
specific confirmation tests for each issue raised

still no one with the local annotations into their report files but the 
ones
that produce ASCII output are definitely more useful there.  Sadly ISS 
seems
totally incapable of producing usefully parsable output for the large 
site.  so
its all ugly and ineffieient hadn work.  makes me continue to long for 
nessus
or heck ISS on UNIX with its nice ascii output reports. 





_______________________________________________
ISSForum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to 
https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo

Reply via email to