Bernhard, you make some pretty vaild points. 

For more information on using a SPANS port Vs taps Vs Top Layer's IDS Balancer see the 
following whitepaper titled "Why not a Switch?":

http://www.joemagee.com/filez/Why%20not%20use%20a%20switch.pdf

Hope this provides some insight. 

Cheers, 

Joe Magee

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Fuchs Bernhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:  Fri, 21 Mar 2003 13:39:18 +0100

>Hi Paul,
>
>ok at first you have following problem. Your span post has 100mb so if you
>are monitoring 3 ports on it with 100mb and 40% utilisation you are loosing
>20% witch makes it unusable for IDS... (a lot of false positives or false
>negatives). and you can*t send rskills on a span port. the next thing is,
>you might have a retundant net so you need a sensor for each computer
>center. another problem is asyncronus routing on loadbalancing. lets say you
>have 2 servers that are loadbalanced. you have 2 packages comming
>(multicast) and one package leaving -> false positive "ICMP onsolicited echo
>reply" for example... so I recommend network tabs and a "IDS-Balancer" This
>is kind of a switch but much better about "36gb backplane" i guess and with
>gigabit... so you can monitor 10x100mb on one gb sensor... pretty cool and
>totaly flexible to configure. i saw the toplayer and hat my handson. but we
>are consider to take a other brand too. keep on asking if you have
>questions....
>
>http://netoptics.com/ 
>http://www.toplayer.com "Attack Mitigator" and "IDS-Balancer"
>
>
>Mit freundlichen Gr��en/ sincerely yours
>
>
>Bernhard Fuchs 
>Junior System-Engineer 
>IT-Infrastruktur/IT-Security
>
>ITELLIUM 
>Systems & Services GmbH 
>F�rther Stra�e 205 
>90429 N�rnberg 
>
>Tel.:   +49-911-14-27321 
>Fax:    +49-911-14-22016 
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>http://www.itellium.com
>
>This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must
>not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received
>this mail in error, please tell us immediately by return email and delete
>the document. E-mails to and from the company are monitored for operational
>reasons and in accordance with lawful business practices. The contents of
>this email are those of the individual and do not necessarily represent the
>views of the company. The company accepts no responsibility once an e-mail
>and any attachments is sent. 
>
>
>-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Paul Van Gurp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. M�rz 2003 15:22
>An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Betreff: [ISSForum] SPAN port for IDS monitoring - Cisco switches
>
>
>Hi all.
>
>I am not a network specialist by any means so please be gentle.  I am
>currently attempting to deploy network sensors throughout our
>infrastructure.  Since we have a switched environment, I have 2 options
>(that I am aware of):
>
>*      use the SPAN port of a switch for a network IDS
>*      use network taps.
>
>Many of our switches have several internal interfaces that I would like to
>monitor...i.e. one switch will be used for traffic destined for 8 different
>networks.  I would like to be able to plug an IDS into the SPAN port of the
>switch and get the networking people to configure the SPAN port to accept
>traffic from port 1, 3, and 8 for example because those are critical network
>segments.  This would allow my IDS to monitor all 3 of those ports at the
>same time.  The network guys say this is not possible and I can only span
>one port on the switch to the SPAN port.  This means using the SPAN port is
>out of the question for our environment.  I went to the Cisco site and it
>seems that the switches are capable of doing what I want, so I am confused.
>
>Question 1:  Who is right...i.e. can a SPAN port monitor traffic over
>multiple incoming/outgoing ports on a single switch?  If not then why not?
>Question 2:  If the network guys are right then why is the SPAN port a
>widely used method of deploying network IDS?
>Question 3:  If the network guys are right, what other options are open to
>me...I mentioned taps but don't I run into the same issues...1 tap for 1
>network segment and so in my example above, I would require 8 taps for the
>switch with 8 ports.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ISSForum mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to
>https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ISSForum mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to 
>https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo
>


_______________________________________________
ISSForum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to 
https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo

Reply via email to