wn
Fusion overhead on Siteprotector is heavy, but the only Internet
Scanner vulnerabilities it collates for are Server Sensor and Network
Sensor events. I don't believe, with so few of these sensors, that
you would need a separate box. "Just my opinion, ISS Support might
disagree."
Two things could get in your way. First is whether the software
will even allow it to work, a test would be in order. The second
thing is if ISS will support you if you run this configuration on
only one server. They sometimes ask you to run a script that
discovers your configuration, once discovered it is possible that
they might not support you on a completely unrelated issue.
Matthew Brown, CISSP, SSCP
Lake Oswego, Oregon, US
---- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ISSForum] RS Fusion Module
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:44:46 +0200
>Hi everyone,
>i have a setup of:
>1- SiteProtector (Single machine)
>2- 3 Net. Sensors
>4- 10 Server Sensors
>5- 25 Desktop agents.
>6- 50 internet scanner
>7- 50 Fusion modules
>8- 10 System Scanner agents
>
>
>I am planning the Hardware requirements for the SiteProtector.
>However i am a bit confused about the Fusion Module.
>after going over the System requirements sheet. i found out that i
>need a dedicated machine for the Attack Patterm component.
>Does this apply to my small setup?
>And as for the System scanner console, is it possible to install it
>on the same machine hosting the SiteProtector.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>/WN
_______________________________________________
ISSForum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to
https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo
