Keep in mind two things:
1- Both installations, basic and custom, should to work better if the hard
drive where the SPDatabase is stored is a high speed drive (SCSI at 10K rpm
or IDE at 7200 rpm - Of course, use SCSI if you can)
2- In a custom installation, the network speed between the two machines is
important too. 10 Mbps/half duplex is a nightmare... 100 Mbps/full-duplex
works OK... a switched network is a plus.
Remenber... everything that you see or query into the SP Console comes from
the SPDatabase through the Application Server.
I hope this help.
Regards,
Jovan Gonzalez Silva
Project Engineer
ETEK INTERNATIONAL - COLOMBIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ss.net To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
cc:
10/07/2003 08:23 Subject: RE: [ISSForum] Siteprotector
and Java..so slooooow
a.m.
Please respond
to issforum
Yes I am experiencing slow application response; I am running SP 2.0.
However, I have everything running on one box; Application Server, Event
Collector, Enterprise Database, and Deployment Manager.
I am running them on a dual 1.0 Ghz Pentium III Box, with 1 GB RAM.
I have since been told by ISS that I need to be running two separate boxes,
one for the Application Server, and the other for the Event Collector and
Enterprise Database
Mike ANderson
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 6:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ISSForum] Siteprotector and Java..so slooooow
Still running RS-SP 1.2 but soon moving to SP 2.0 and i have a
question tough which falls under developing/performance category of
this application.basically my question is ISS plans to develop
Siteprotector as a java application.I'm not much into app developing
but from my experience similar applications running large amounts of
logs and which are not developed in java but as standalone ones run
way too much faster than those on java.Whenever i try to
filter,switch from one sensor to another or whatever task available
in SiteProtector Console , it takes so long that i find myself
invoking task manager to kill Siteprotector task.
Anyone experiencing the same? Sloooow applocation response? I have
some expectations about a better performance on SP2.Haven't tried SP
2.0 still tough.
10x
JaimeO.
**************************************************************************************************
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient,
or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it
from your
computer.
**************************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
ISSForum mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to
https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo
