Bernard 1. The system requirement for RSSP refers to the console needed to manage the component. It does NOT mean they have to run on the same HW.
2. Why do you want to install it without using Deployment Manager? The big advantage of using DM is that the installed module is automatically added to SiteProtector. 3. The correct name is 3rd Party Adapter and it has nothing to do with the 3rd Party Module. I hope this help. Jean Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ISSForum] Where to install Fusion Third Party Module Hi all, ISS technical support says " Both the basic SiteProtector Installation and the Security Fusion Module require a dedicated system. Installing the 3rd Party Module on either system is not a supported configuration." Any comments on this ? The system requirement doc of the 3rd party module says it requires RSSP 2.0 SP 1.1. I read it as it needs to be installed on the RSSP m/c. Am I right ? A contradiction to the ISS Technical Support. I feel that the 3rd Party Module is a small enough component that can go with RSSP on the same m/c. Since I have a basic install RSSP M/C, how can I install the 3rd Party Module without using Deployment Manager ? Do I need the 3rd Party Module Adaptor on top of the 3rd Party Module ? This 3rd Party Module Adaptor kit cannot be found on the CD but only on the web site with the name RealSecureSensor70.exe. Isn't that weird ? I think ISS really has to improve their documentation of the Fusion products. TIA Bernard _______________________________________________ ISSForum mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo _______________________________________________ ISSForum mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo
