If it's really so, how do you suggest to investigate if it's so or not??
I see only TCP_Port_Scans from A (in Internet) to B (in LAN), no
P2P_Activity, no *_Probe_*
I have all Probes switched on, and I know that if packet comes to closed
port Probe should be triggered...
I think it's not P2P. Any another ideas?

---
Best regards, Sergey V. Soldatov.
Information security department.
tel/fax +7 495 745 89 50 
tel +7 495 777 77 07 (1613) 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Palmer, Paul (ISSAtlanta) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:04 PM
> To: Soldatov, Sergey V.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ISSForum] TCP_Port_Scan
> 
> Sergey,
> 
> A data packet on an established connection would not 
> contribute to the TCP_Port_Scan signature.
> 
> We have seen a large increase in the number of TCP_Port_Scan 
> signatures triggered on customer networks over the last year 
> or so. Based upon my experience, the most likely explanation 
> for these events is Peer to Peer traffic. Some Peer to Peer 
> protocols will result in establishing a large number of out 
> of band callback ports for data transfer. If these are 
> blocked at the firewall or if the client goes offline it can 
> result in a large number of failed connection attempts. These 
> failed attempts, in turn, contribute to the port scan events 
> as the closed ports often remain registered on the peer to 
> peer network for some time.
> 
> Paul  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Soldatov, Sergey V.
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ISSForum] TCP_Port_Scan
> 
> 
> Hi list!
> In my SP console I see a lot of TCP_Port_Scan events for 
> Internet IPs to my local IPs. I suppose that this are  false 
> positives because of HTTP replies from visited Web-sites, but 
> unfortunately I can't figure out if it's so, because SP (and 
> it's strange) does not show attacker's source port in event 
> details... Does anybody can recommend something to help me 
> investigate these TCP_Port_Scan events.
> 
> May be someone have experience in tuning TCP_Port_Scan event?
> 
> Any feedback will be welcome.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> ---
> Best regards, Sergey V. Soldatov.
> Information security department.
> tel/fax +7 495 745 89 50
> tel +7 495 777 77 07 (1613)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ISSForum mailing list
> [email protected]
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to
> https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum
> 
> To contact the ISSForum Moderator, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> The ISSForum mailing list is hosted and managed by Internet Security
> Systems, 6303 Barfield Road, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 30328.
> 


_______________________________________________
ISSForum mailing list
[email protected]

TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, go to 
https://atla-mm1.iss.net/mailman/listinfo/issforum

To contact the ISSForum Moderator, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The ISSForum mailing list is hosted and managed by Internet Security Systems, 
6303 Barfield Road, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 30328.

Reply via email to