[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-7578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16617727#comment-16617727
 ] 

Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-7578:
---------------------------------------

This makes sense to me. I've been meaning to revisit how this all works.

> More flexible placement rules
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-7578
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-7578
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Backend
>    Affects Versions: Impala 3.0
>            Reporter: Balazs Jeszenszky
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: admission-control, resource-management
>
> Currently, placement rules can be defined based on user names or 
> (primary/secondary) group names as a direct mapping. This promotes creating 
> much more pools than might be needed, and leads to administrative overhead 
> when changing names or adding a new user/group.
> It would be good to have a more elaborate mapping, e.g. translate user/group 
> names into pools (including potentially mapping multiple users/groups to the 
> same pool), either manually or via regular expressions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to