[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-7504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Ho updated IMPALA-7504:
-------------------------------
Target Version: Product Backlog (was: Impala 3.2.0)
> ParseKerberosPrincipal() should use krb5_parse_name() instead
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-7504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-7504
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Security
> Affects Versions: Impala 3.0, Impala 2.12.0
> Reporter: Michael Ho
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: ramp-up
>
> [~tlipcon] pointed out during code review that we should be using
> krb5_parse_name() to parse the principal instead of creating our own
> bq. I wonder whether we should just be using krb5_parse_name here instead of
> implementing our own parsing? According to
> [http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.15/doc/appdev/refs/api/krb5_parse_name.html]
> there are various escapings, etc, that this function isn't currently
> supporting.
> We currently do the following to parse the principal:
> {noformat}
> vector<string> names;
> split(names, principal, is_any_of("/"));
> if (names.size() != 2) return Status(TErrorCode::BAD_PRINCIPAL_FORMAT,
> principal);
> *service_name = names[0];
> string remaining_principal = names[1];
> split(names, remaining_principal, is_any_of("@"));
> if (names.size() != 2) return Status(TErrorCode::BAD_PRINCIPAL_FORMAT,
> principal);
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]