[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16853212#comment-16853212
]
Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-8425:
---------------------------------------
[~joemcdonnell] did you have a working patch for #2?
I'm hacking around a bit here with stripping the binary and removing
libfesupport.so, which only incrementally helps. Here's what I'm seeing inside
the container after those changes.
{noformat}
$ du -s -h *
135M bin
244K conf
358M lib
1.7M logs
3.6M www
{noformat}
The image size didn't go down that much though:
{noformat}
impala_base latest c77debd2a7ec About a minute
ago 2.57GB
{noformat}
> Evaluate size of Impala docker containers
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-8425
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8425
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Infrastructure
> Reporter: Tim Armstrong
> Assignee: Joe McDonnell
> Priority: Major
>
> We should take a look at the size of the containers produced by the build and
> see if it is worth optimising. I think the main contributor to size right now
> is likely the impala binary, which we could shrink by stripping debug
> symbols. We could also look at using a different base image from Ubuntu.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
