[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tim Armstrong reassigned IMPALA-8442:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee:     (was: Tim Armstrong)

> Clean up concurrency around query_status_
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-8442
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8442
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Backend
>            Reporter: Tim Armstrong
>            Priority: Major
>
> The handling of concurrent access to ClientRequestState::query_status_ is 
> messy - it's exposed directly via query_status() and a lot of callers don't 
> hold ClientRequestState::lock_.
> This appears to be safe in many places for subtle reasons, e.g. because the 
> value won't be modified after a certain point in the query lifecycle, so it's 
> not dangerous to access it when logging an audit record. However this is 
> brittle and likely to lead with bugs if we change the code around it 
> signicantly.
> We could approach this in various ways, e.g. updating callers to consistently 
> acquire the lock and/or documenting invariants around when its safe to do so 
> without holding it. Or we could make Status thread-safe, or have a 
> thread-safe Status wrapper.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscr...@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-h...@impala.apache.org

Reply via email to