[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17040344#comment-17040344
]
Joe McDonnell commented on IMPALA-9351:
---------------------------------------
[~norbertluksa] One workaround is to use a different complex types table. The
"complextypestbl" table has a complex schema, and we load our own file into it
rather than write it with Hive. The file should always be in the same location.
So, if you used the path
"/test-warehouse/complextypestbl_orc_def/nullable.orc", I think it should work.
[https://github.com/apache/impala/blob/master/testdata/datasets/functional/functional_schema_template.sql#L686-L709]
> AnalyzeDDLTest.TestCreateTableLikeFileOrc failed due to non-existing path
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-9351
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9351
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Frontend
> Reporter: Fang-Yu Rao
> Assignee: Norbert Luksa
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: broken-build, flaky-test
>
> AnalyzeDDLTest.TestCreateTableLikeFileOrc failed due to a non-existing path.
> Specifically, we see the following error message.
> {code:java}
> Error Message
> Error during analysis:
> org.apache.impala.common.AnalysisException: Cannot infer schema, path does
> not exist:
> hdfs://localhost:20500/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0
> sql:
> create table if not exists newtbl_DNE like orc
> '/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0'
> {code}
> The stack trace is provided in the following.
> {code:java}
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> Error during analysis:
> org.apache.impala.common.AnalysisException: Cannot infer schema, path does
> not exist:
> hdfs://localhost:20500/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0
> sql:
> create table if not exists newtbl_DNE like orc
> '/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0'
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at
> org.apache.impala.common.FrontendFixture.analyzeStmt(FrontendFixture.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.impala.common.FrontendTestBase.AnalyzesOk(FrontendTestBase.java:244)
> at
> org.apache.impala.common.FrontendTestBase.AnalyzesOk(FrontendTestBase.java:185)
> at
> org.apache.impala.analysis.AnalyzeDDLTest.TestCreateTableLikeFileOrc(AnalyzeDDLTest.java:2045)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:272)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:236)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:386)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:323)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:143)
> {code}
> This test was recently added by [~norbertluksa], and [~boroknagyz] gave a +2,
> maybe [~boroknagyz] could provide some insight into this? Thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
