[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17058896#comment-17058896
 ] 

Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-2939:
---------------------------------------

[~gaborkaszab] I guess we probably would want to re-profile these queries to 
see what the bottleneck is before making targeted fixes.

> Nested Types : Address Runtime & Scoped timer overhead
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-2939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-2939
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Backend
>    Affects Versions: Impala 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Mostafa Mokhtar
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: complextype, nested_types, performance
>         Attachments: Bottom-Up-HotFunctions.csv, Top-Down-HotFunctions.csv, 
> nestedTypesQ1.zip
>
>
> For the following query about 45% of the time is spent in updating timers, 
> RunTimeProfile and checking query state, since NestedTypes don't always 
> operate on Batches the overhead of updating counters is amplified. 
> {code}
> select 
>     l.l_shipdate, count(*) as wins
> from
>     customer.c_orders o,
>     o.o_lineitems l
> where
>     o_orderdate = '1993-12-12'
> group by l.l_shipdate
> order by wins;
> {code}
> |Function||Effective Time by Utilization||
> |clock_gettime        29.8%   0s      0s      librt.so.1|     clock_gettime|
> |impala::RuntimeProfile::Counter::Add|        5.3%|
> |std::map<std::string, impala::RuntimeProfile::Counter*, 
> std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, 
> impala::RuntimeProfile::Counter*>>>::operator[]| 4.7%|
> |impala::RuntimeState::CheckQueryState|       3.2%|
> |impala::MonotonicStopWatch::Stop|    2.7%|



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to