[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17153094#comment-17153094
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on IMPALA-9789:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit 9429ca7aa2fe127af11073b2fc09bc8e62d2e410 in impala's branch 
refs/heads/master from wzhou-code
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=impala.git;h=9429ca7 ]

IMPALA-9789: Disable ineffective bloom filters for Kudu scan

Bump Kudu version to 23f67ae0d. This pulls in the latest version of
Kudu which includes a performance enhancement in Kudu server for bloom
filter. Kudu uses same heuristics as HDFS to disable ineffective bloom
filter. This fixs the performance regression issue for queries like
TPCH-Q9 so that we can set query option ENABLED_RUNTIME_FILTER_TYPES
as ALL to enable bloom filter for Kudu by default.

Testing:
 - Ran single_node_perf_run.py with TPCH for Kudu and verified that
   there was no regression issue for each query.
 - Passed all core tests.

Change-Id: Ib55fa359e2fdb2c03c890f2303ffd9173c3c4af1
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16138
Reviewed-by: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>


> Disable ineffective bloom filters for Kudu scan
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-9789
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9789
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Backend, Frontend
>    Affects Versions: Impala 3.4.0
>            Reporter: Wenzhe Zhou
>            Assignee: Wenzhe Zhou
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Impala 4.0
>
>
> In bloom-filter benchmark for Kudu, there is performance regression for query 
> TPCH-Q9. In Profile shows that 5 bloom filters are generated by hash join. 
> Some of those filters are not useful for filtering rows. When pushing all 
> bloom filters to Kudu, the bloom filter evaluations add extra cost for Kudu 
> scan, which cause performance regression.
>  
> The regression on Q9 looks a lot like 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9302, where Q9 regressed a lot 
> with multithreading initially because ineffective filters weren't being 
> disabled. This query is a bit special in that there are many filters pushed 
> to scan 2, and most of them are not useful. Based on our experience there, we 
> need to add a method to disable ineffective filters for Kudu scan.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to