[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-10472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Quanlong Huang reassigned IMPALA-10472:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Alexey Serbin

> Add a flag to control Kudu client connection negotiation timeout in backend
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-10472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-10472
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Backend
>            Reporter: Alexey Serbin
>            Assignee: Alexey Serbin
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: Kudu, client, rpc
>             Fix For: Impala 4.0.0
>
>
> Since [KUDU-2966|http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2966] is 
> addressed, it's now possible to control the RPC connection negotiation 
> timeout from the Kudu client's side (C++ client).  To use the newly 
> introduced functionality in Impala's back-end, it's necessary to provide a 
> control knob for that.
> This should help to address cases where busy/overloaded cluster nodes hosting 
> Kudu tablet servers aren't fast enough to negotiate new connections within 
> the default timeout interval (in most cases that's about Kudu server's 
> connection negotiation threads being scheduled as needed and getting enough 
> CPU time).  In practice, it's necessary to customize the corresponding 
> setting on the Kudu server side: it's controlled by the 
> {{\-\-rpc_negotiation_timeout_ms}} flag for {{kudu-master}} and 
> {{kudu-tserver}}.
> The idea is to add a gflag named like 
> {{\-\-kudu_client_connection_negotiation_timeout_ms}} with default value of 
> 3000.  The default value 3000 is to keep the new code backwards-compatible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to