[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-12018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17805757#comment-17805757
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on IMPALA-12018:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit a2b8aed2c2d4c1bb25ed9626a2b014b79ec741ad in impala's branch 
refs/heads/master from Riza Suminto
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=impala.git;h=a2b8aed2c ]

IMPALA-12702: Show reduced cardinality estimation in ExecSummary

In the query profile, cardinality reduction from IMPALA-12018 is
highlighted in Plan section, but missing out from ExecSummary section.
This patch changes the ExecSummary to show the reduced cardinality
estimation if it set.

Testing:
- Add TestObservability::test_reduced_cardinality_by_filter

Change-Id: If1f51ce585a1cb66e518b725686ab3076ffa8168
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/20879
Reviewed-by: Wenzhe Zhou <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>


> Consider runtime filters in resource estimates
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-12018
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-12018
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Frontend
>            Reporter: Csaba Ringhofer
>            Assignee: Riza Suminto
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Impala 4.4.0
>
>
> Currently Impala creates a plan first and looks for runtime filters bases on 
> the complete plan.
> IMPALA-3573 is about considering runtime filters during join ordering which 
> would be a major change. Meanwhile it could be also useful to consider 
> selective looking runtime filters in resource estimates without changing the 
> plan topology.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to