[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-12989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Quanlong Huang updated IMPALA-12989:
------------------------------------
Description:
In order to release the binaries, we need the LICENSE and NOTICE files added in
the DEB/RPM packages.
{quote}*COMPILED PACKAGES*
The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases are
in the form of the source materials needed to make changes to the software
being released.
As a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to build a
compiled version of the source, binary/bytecode packages MAY be distributed
alongside official Apache releases. In all such cases, the binary/bytecode
package MUST have the same version number as the source release and MUST only
add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the
source code release and its dependencies.
*Licensing Documentation*
Each package MUST provide a {{LICENSE}} file and a {{NOTICE}} file which
account for the package's exact content. {{LICENSE}} and {{NOTICE}} MUST NOT
provide unnecessary information about materials which are not bundled in the
package, such as separately downloaded dependencies.
For source packages, {{LICENSE}} and {{NOTICE}} MUST be located at the root of
the distribution. For additional packages, they MUST be located in the
distribution format's customary location for licensing materials, such as the
{{META-INF}} directory of Java "jar" files.
{quote}
[https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation]
was:
In order to release the binaries, we need the LICENSE and NOTICE files added in
the DEB/RPM packages.
{quote}For source packages, {{LICENSE}} and {{NOTICE}} MUST be located at the
root of the distribution. For additional packages, they MUST be located in the
distribution format's customary location for licensing materials, such as the
{{META-INF}} directory of Java "jar" files.
{quote}
[https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation]
> LICENSE and NOTICE files are missing in DEB/RPM packages
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-12989
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-12989
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Infrastructure
> Reporter: Quanlong Huang
> Assignee: Quanlong Huang
> Priority: Major
>
> In order to release the binaries, we need the LICENSE and NOTICE files added
> in the DEB/RPM packages.
> {quote}*COMPILED PACKAGES*
> The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases
> are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes to the
> software being released.
> As a convenience to users that might not have the appropriate tools to build
> a compiled version of the source, binary/bytecode packages MAY be distributed
> alongside official Apache releases. In all such cases, the binary/bytecode
> package MUST have the same version number as the source release and MUST only
> add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of
> the source code release and its dependencies.
> *Licensing Documentation*
> Each package MUST provide a {{LICENSE}} file and a {{NOTICE}} file which
> account for the package's exact content. {{LICENSE}} and {{NOTICE}} MUST NOT
> provide unnecessary information about materials which are not bundled in the
> package, such as separately downloaded dependencies.
> For source packages, {{LICENSE}} and {{NOTICE}} MUST be located at the root
> of the distribution. For additional packages, they MUST be located in the
> distribution format's customary location for licensing materials, such as the
> {{META-INF}} directory of Java "jar" files.
> {quote}
> [https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing-documentation]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
