[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-14073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18007943#comment-18007943
 ] 

Michael Smith commented on IMPALA-14073:
----------------------------------------

I've updated IMPALA-14176 to cover investigating the actual behavioral issue 
this test exposed.

> test_local_catalog_ddls_with_invalidate_metadata_sync_ddl is flaky after 
> IMPALA-13631
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMPALA-14073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-14073
>             Project: IMPALA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Catalog, Test
>    Affects Versions: Impala 5.0.0
>            Reporter: Riza Suminto
>            Assignee: Michael Smith
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: broken-build
>
> IMPALA-13631 change alterTableOrViewRename to not hold catalog version lock 
> while making HMS RPC.
> It adds back-and-forth ALTER TABLE RENAME testcase into 
> test_local_catalog_ddls_with_invalidate_metadata_sync_ddl, which make it 
> flaky for causing DDL occasionally not finding the target table after 
> concurrent RENAME-INVALIDATE-REFRESH.
> We need to understand what happen and how to make the test deterministic.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscr...@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-h...@impala.apache.org

Reply via email to