[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14630365#comment-14630365
 ] 

Christopher L. Shannon commented on AMQ-5889:
---------------------------------------------

I have started work on this and have a basic prototype working for TCP and NIO. 
 It still needs some work and I need to look at SSL as well.  The plan is to 
have a configuration that looks something like:

{noformat}
 <transportConnectors>
    <transportConnector name="auto" uri="auto://0.0.0.0:61616"/>  
    <transportConnector name="autonio" uri="auto://0.0.0.0:61617"/> 
    <transportConnector name="auto+ssl" uri="auto://0.0.0.0:61618"/>  
    <transportConnector name="autonio+ssl" uri="auto://0.0.0.0:61619"/> 
 </transportConnectors>
{noformat}

Then each one of those transports would automatically detect the wire protocol 
(OpenWire, Stomp, MQTT, or AMQP)

> Support a single port for all wire protocols
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-5889
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5889
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.11.1
>            Reporter: Christopher L. Shannon
>
> Both Apollo and Artemis support the ability to use a single port for all 
> protocols and to have automatic detection for the protocol being used.  It 
> would be nice to be able to support at least a subset of this feature in the 
> 5.x broker as well.
> Ideally we should at least be able to detect OpenWire, MQTT, STOMP, and AMQP 
> over a TCP, SSL, and NIO transport.  Websockets and HTTP would be a bonus but 
> could be more difficult to implement depending on how this could work with 
> Jetty so that would take some investigation.
> This is especially useful in environments where having to open up several new 
> ports can be difficult because of firewall and security restrictions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to