[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14904881#comment-14904881
 ] 

Daniel Kulp commented on AMQ-5966:
----------------------------------

If you add:
{code:java}
            factory.setNonBlockingRedelivery(true);
{code}
to the ActiveMQConnectionFactory, then the test would pass as it wouldn't block 
during the delivery and would head new a new session.  Thus, there is a 
workaround.  (although I don't know what other behavior changes that would 
introduce)

> ActiveMQ client hangs after rollback of a transacted JMS session
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-5966
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5966
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JMS client
>    Affects Versions: 5.12.0
>         Environment: Reproduced standalone under Linux, but any environment 
> should be affected.
>            Reporter: Andreas Mattes
>         Attachments: AMQRollbackTest.java
>
>
> The ActiveMQ JMS client is accessed through the ConnectionConsumer protocol. 
> A ServerSessionPool is provided which creates ServerSessions with transacted 
> JMS sessions. Up to ActiveMQ 5.11.2, everything has worked fine, but with 
> ActiveMQ 5.12.0, after rollback of a sesseion, the application hangs until 
> JMS re-connect happens. Further investigation reveals that with ActiveMQ 
> 5.11.2 and earlier, after rollback a new ServerSession is taken from the pool 
> and loaded with the message of the rolled back session. With ActiveMQ 5.12.0, 
> however, the MessageListener of the same session is called again. This is a 
> problem with the ConnectionConsumer protocol, because the may have claimed 
> the session for recycling.
> The attached piece of test code (AMQRollbackTest.java) demonstrates the 
> issue. It runs fine with ActiveMQ 5.11.2 and hangs with ActiveMQ 5.12.0. It 
> demonstrates the issue for QueueSessions, but TopicSessions are affected 
> equally.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to