[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15068300#comment-15068300
 ] 

Christopher L. Shannon commented on AMQ-6099:
---------------------------------------------

Good points, [~tabish121].  The second one is especially tricky.  I could also 
see a scenario where messages are read by the wrong marshaller and there's no 
error because the bytes happen to line up, but they are read into the wrong 
fields.  The more I think about it the more ways I could see this going badly 
if trying to unmarshall something with the wrong marshaller version and not 
being able to properly handle it.

> Allow broker to read any OpenWire version from KahaDB
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-6099
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6099
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: KahaDB
>    Affects Versions: 5.x
>            Reporter: Tim Bain
>
> The current KahaDB implementation only allows a single OpenWire version to be 
> read from the store.  This works fine during normal operations, but when a 
> user upgrades to a version of ActiveMQ that uses a different OpenWire 
> version, the new broker is unable to read any persisted messages from the 
> store because of the version mismatch, as described in AMQ-5995.
> Broker upgrades are going to happen, and the requirement that they be done 
> with an empty message store, or that the user apply temporary workarounds 
> like running the old broker in a networked configuration that's not the 
> standard config for the cluster, leads to a less-than-satisfactory experience 
> during the upgrade. As much as possible, broker upgrades should be seamless; 
> sometimes that's not possible, but in this case it seems like code that would 
> be able to read any version of OpenWire but only write the current one (and 
> that could be less-efficient with older versions if necessary) wouldn't be 
> all that hard and would eliminate this problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to