[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gary Tully reopened AMQ-4467:
-----------------------------
      Assignee: Gary Tully  (was: Dejan Bosanac)

The fix applies the cursor high water mark value to the shared system usage 
limit in error.
When checking if the shared or parent system usage is exhausted a value of 100% 
should be used while the per destination limit can be validated against the 
memoryUsageHighWaterMark via the perDestination percentUsage.

This becomes apparent with low values for memoryUsageHighWaterMark. With N 
destinations, the shared system usage can easily exceed this low per 
destination value and starve dispatch/pageIn for subsequent destinations.


> Memory usage percent can be exceeded much if PFC is disabled
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-4467
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4467
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.x
>            Reporter: SuoNayi
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>             Fix For: 5.9.0
>
>         Attachments: AMQ-4467.patch
>
>
> If PFC is disabled, when the store cursor checks limits, it checks only the 
> memory percentage of its own MemoryUsage and compares it to the high water 
> mark. Otherwise if PFC is enabled, it checks whether the MemoryUsage is 
> "full" but the "isFull" method also checks its parents.
> This issue arrises when you have memory limits set on queues higher than the 
> overall system limit, as well as if you have multiple queues who's memory 
> limits combined are higher than the overall system limit. These settings must 
> be taken into account.
> The original form can be found at 
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/What-can-be-reason-of-460-memory-usage-limit-td4665651.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to