[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15905126#comment-15905126
]
Martyn Taylor commented on ARTEMIS-550:
---------------------------------------
[~graben]
Are you saying that it is not possible to implement these things using the new
address model? I agree that the existing naming conventions i.e. using "::" is
different to ActiveMQ 5.x, and there are gaps wrt how things are configured.
For example using prefixing. The JIRA I added above is intended to track gap
in the naming schema, like for example using prefixes instead of FQQN.
What I don't want to do, is just clone the way ActiveMQ 5.x does virtual
topics, as it doesn't fit in well with the Artemis architecture. Instead, I
plan on providing generic solutions for things like address aliasing that solve
part of the problem, whilst being an overall useful feature for other use cases.
> Add support for virtual topic consumers
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-550
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Benjamin Graf
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
>
> Artemis should support virtual topic consumers as alternative to topic
> subscriptions as ActiveMQ itself does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
