[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15905157#comment-15905157
]
Benjamin Graf edited comment on ARTEMIS-550 at 3/10/17 2:19 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
[~martyntaylor]]
Well, if virtual topics will not be supported the way it is supported actually
that would be disappointing to many users IMHO. One big benefit is that you can
configure it with just one line in the broker configuration and you have dozens
topic to queue combinations addressed for now an for the future. It's only
about naming pattern. I don't think this gap can be closed with an OpenWire
modification.
was (Author: graben):
[~mtaylor]
Well, if virtual topics will not be supported the way it is supported actually
that would be disappointing to many users IMHO. One big benefit is that you can
configure it with just one line in the broker configuration and you have dozens
topic to queue combinations addressed for now an for the future. It's only
about naming pattern. I don't think this gap can be closed with an OpenWire
modification.
> Add support for virtual topic consumers
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-550
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Benjamin Graf
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
>
> Artemis should support virtual topic consumers as alternative to topic
> subscriptions as ActiveMQ itself does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
