[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15957037#comment-15957037
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1093:
-----------------------------------------

Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1172
  
    @mtaylor ok. BTW I didn't change the send part at all. My thought is that 
sending is always targeted to an address, not a queue, so it doesn't make sense 
to reference an address by FQQN.


> Full qualified queue name support
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Howard Gao
>            Assignee: Howard Gao
>             Fix For: 2.next
>
>
> Broker should support full qualified queue names (FQQN) as well as bare queue 
> names. This means when clients access to a queue they have two equivalent 
> ways to do so. One way is by queue names and the other is by FQQN (i.e. 
> address::qname) names. When accessing a queue by its bare name, it is 
> required that the name should be unique across all addresses.
> Otherwise a warning is given and client should use FQQN instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to