[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15965867#comment-15965867
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1093:
-----------------------------------------
GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1201
ARTEMIS-1093 Added more tests for FQQN
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gaohoward/activemq-artemis master_more_fqqn
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1201.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1201
----
commit aced1224d42f96c1205a4d7225722c1456511618
Author: Howard Gao <[email protected]>
Date: 2017-04-12T12:55:29Z
ARTEMIS-1093 Added more tests for FQQN
----
> Full qualified queue name support
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Howard Gao
> Assignee: Howard Gao
> Fix For: 2.next
>
>
> Broker should support full qualified queue names (FQQN) as well as bare queue
> names. This means when clients access to a queue they have two equivalent
> ways to do so. One way is by queue names and the other is by FQQN (i.e.
> address::qname) names. When accessing a queue by its bare name, it is
> required that the name should be unique across all addresses.
> Otherwise a warning is given and client should use FQQN instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
