[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16001404#comment-16001404
]
clebert suconic commented on ARTEMIS-1015:
------------------------------------------
Is this still an issue? It seems fixed based on ARTEMIS-795
> Artemis keeps temporary queue on AMQP detach
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1015
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1015
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: AMQP
> Reporter: Ulf Lilleengen
> Fix For: 2.next
>
> Attachments: broker.log, router.log, unsubscribe.py
>
>
> I have a setup with 1 client subscriber connecting to a broker through a qpid
> dispatch router which is setup with a connector to the broker and a linkRoute
> on a particular address 'mytopic'.
> This address is configured as a multicast address in the broker config. The
> client subscriber marks the link as non-durable, and when I query the broker
> management, it confirms that it has a temporary non-durable queue created.
> When I connect the client directly to the broker, this temporary queue is
> deleted when the client disconnects. If I connect through the router, the
> temporary queue is still there with 0 consumers after the client has
> disconnected.
> When the client closes its connection to the router, the router sends a
> detach to the broker, but the session is left open. It looks to me that the
> broker does not remove the temporary queue until the session is ended or the
> connection is closed. What I would expect is that the temporary queue is
> deleted when the link is detached.
> Attached is the logs from the broker and router.
> A reproducer: http://people.redhat.com/~ulilleen/artemis-temp-queues.tar.gz
> 1. Use configuration file from instance/etc/broker.xml
> 2. Start broker using broker.sh
> 2. Start router using router.sh
> 3. Start client using client.sh
> 4. Disconnect client
> 5. Query broker management to see that temporary queue is still there
> This can probably be reproduced with a client just doing a detach.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)