[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
clebert suconic closed ARTEMIS-1210.
------------------------------------
> Queue name should create Queue with Address in its name by default
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1210
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1210
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce
>
> When making a consumer for a topic (multicast) address, a queue is created
> named with for shared subscriber just the subscription name and if present
> client id only or in case of durable consumer it is the clientid + name only.
> This causes issue where client can validly use the same name's but for
> different address's.
> e.g.
> 2017-06-07 01:33:21.144 WARN 70432 --- [nerContainer-28]
> o.s.j.l.DefaultMessageListenerContainer : Setup of JMS message listener
> invoker failed for destination 'com.ig.trading.v0.order.history' - trying to
> recover. Cause: AMQ119082: Queue opstest already exists on another
> subscription
> To avoid this clash including the address in the queue name (as like for any
> cast queues) would solve this issue.
> Also it seems
> https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/2.1.0/address-model.html alludes
> that actually this is the behaviour to include the address name in the
> consumer queue name.
> A clunky work around is obviously for the clients to ensure the name is
> globally unique by manually postfix'ing or prefix'ing the topic/address name.
> Though if this is the way forward the documents for address-model need to be
> updated with this detail, and avoid alluding to the pattern that the address
> is added by the system. Likewise frameworks like Spring would make a work
> around approach very fragile.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
