[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16200136#comment-16200136
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AMQ-6771:
------------------------------------------------------
Commit d66e96e8bc7be51a93835149e132204407d79b5f in activemq's branch
refs/heads/activemq-5.15.x from [~gtully]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;h=d66e96e ]
[AMQ-6831, AMQ-6771] trigger eofexception on read -1 - AMQ6522Test
(cherry picked from commit e793260573f30365572a1e7507cd98e9ed17b1b5)
> Improve performance of KahaDB recovery check checkForCorruptJournalFiles=true
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-6771
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6771
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: KahaDB
> Affects Versions: 5.15.0
> Reporter: Gary Tully
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Fix For: 5.15.1, 5.16.0
>
>
> The KahaDB checkForCorruptJournalFiles option validates the checksum of every
> journal batch record on startup. If a single producer writes many small
> messages, the batch sizes in the journal will be small. The current check
> implementation reads each batch at a time with a fseek/read sequence that can
> be very slow over shared disks.
> The check can be a quick buffered sequential read using the maxBatchSize
> which should already be tuned to match the disk transfer rate.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)