[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16338997#comment-16338997
]
Benjamin Graf commented on ARTEMIS-550:
---------------------------------------
I'm actually testing to use "virtualTopic" via FQQN with native CORE protocol
via JMS. I only get it working with explicit address configuration:
Server:
{code:xml}
<address name="TEST_TOPIC">
<multicast>
<queue name="VirtualTopicConsumers.test" />
</multicast>
</address>{code}
Client: (Camel JMS)
{code:xml}
<from uri="jms:queue:TEST_TOPIC::VirtualTopicConsumers.test"/>{code}
Is there a more dynamic/easier way of configuration at the moment?
> Add support for virtual topic consumers
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-550
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Benjamin Graf
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Major
>
> Artemis should support virtual topic consumers as alternative to topic
> subscriptions as ActiveMQ itself does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
