[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16341270#comment-16341270
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-550:
----------------------------------------
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1820#discussion_r164163557
--- Diff:
artemis-jms-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/client/ActiveMQSession.java
---
@@ -698,8 +699,17 @@ private ActiveMQMessageConsumer createConsumer(final
ActiveMQDestination dest,
*/
if (!response.isExists() ||
!response.getQueueNames().contains(dest.getSimpleAddress())) {
if (response.isAutoCreateQueues()) {
+ SimpleString queueNameToUse = dest.getSimpleAddress();
+ SimpleString addressToUse = queueNameToUse;
+ RoutingType routingTypeToUse = RoutingType.ANYCAST;
+ if
(CompositeAddress.isFullyQualified(queueNameToUse.toString())) {
+ CompositeAddress compositeAddress =
CompositeAddress.getQueueName(queueNameToUse.toString());
+ addressToUse = new
SimpleString(compositeAddress.getAddress());
+ queueNameToUse = new
SimpleString(compositeAddress.getQueueName());
+ routingTypeToUse = RoutingType.MULTICAST;
--- End diff --
So if this is related to virtual topics why complicate things for the Core
JMS client and introduce such problems it has JMS 2.0 spec as such shared
durable subscribers, which is the spec equiv of such feature.
> Add support for virtual topic consumers
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-550
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Benjamin Graf
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2018-01-26-09-02-08-192.png
>
>
> Artemis should support virtual topic consumers as alternative to topic
> subscriptions as ActiveMQ itself does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
