[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Justin Bertram resolved ARTEMIS-1644.
-------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.5.0

> Legacy clients can't access addresses/queues explicitly configured with 
> "jms.queue." and "jms.topic." prefixes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1644
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1644
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Justin Bertram
>            Assignee: Justin Bertram
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>
> There is logic in the broker to detect Artemis 1.x and HornetQ clients which 
> will automatically:
>  * set {{anycastPrefix}} and {{multicastPrefix}} to "jms.queue." and 
> "jms.topic." respectively
>  * convert queue/address names in network packets
> In general this works perfectly for such clients.  However, if there are 
> addresses and/or queues on the broker explicitly configured with either 
> "jms.queue." or "jms.topic." then these clients will not be able to access 
> these resources.
> The solution is two fold:
>  * disable the automatic detection logic
>  * support Artemis 1.x and HornetQ clients using explicitly configured 
> {{anycastPrefix}} and {{multicastPrefix}} acceptor url parameters
> Disabling the automatic detection logic will change the default behavior for 
> any acceptor supporting the CORE protocol since it would previously support 
> these older clients automatically.  It would be possible to mitigate the 
> impact of this change by adding the prefix parameters to the default url in 
> broker.xml, but this is not recommended as this might negatively impact 
> performance for high throughput use-cases.  A comment in broker.xml will be 
> added instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to