[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16352828#comment-16352828 ]
Jarek Przygódzki edited comment on ARTEMIS-1648 at 2/5/18 7:52 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Not really. What happens in current master (19147e49869d23906baf2cc07d98564043b3b0e0) is really messed up - consumer calling {{ActiveMQJMSContext#createQueue}} creates a queue with prefixed name and that messages from 'exampleQueue' on source node are forwarded to 'jms.queue.exampleQueue' on node with active consumer where two different queue exists - 'jms.queue.exampleQueue' and 'exampleQueue'. Message are no longer lost, but are forwarded to wrong queue! was (Author: jarek-przygodzki): Not really. What happens in current master (19147e49869d23906baf2cc07d98564043b3b0e0) is really messed up - consumer calling {{ActiveMQJMSContext#createQueue}} creates a queue with prefixed name and that messages from 'myQueue' on source node are forwarded to 'jms.queue.exampleQueue' on node with active consumer where two different queue exists - 'jms.queue.exampleQueue' and 'exampleQueue'. Message are no longer lost, but are forwarded to wrong queue! > Messages from 1.x clients to 2.x cluster are lost when they are load balanced > to nodes with matching consumers > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARTEMIS-1648 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1648 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Broker > Affects Versions: 2.3.0 > Reporter: Jarek Przygódzki > Priority: Major > > When a message from 1.x client is transfered to node in the cluster with > matching consumers (message-load-balancing=ON_DEMAND), it's moved to > appropriate replication queue, forwarded to target node and then subsequently > dropped because there aren't any matching bindings for message address. This > is because if the original message is sent to address with the jms.queue > prefix (1.x clients), than the message sent by ClusterConnectionBridge also > has the prefixed destination address and this situation is not supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)