[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16490669#comment-16490669
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1888:
-----------------------------------------
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2109
Can I merge this after 2.6.1? it's adding a property to configuration.. so
it doesn't really make it a micro release.
I could cherry-pick commits but if I leave this out for now it would make
life easier...
Just one thing.. can you amend your commit messages as:
```
ARTEMIS-1888 - Add forceSSLParameters flag to override system SSL properties
If true the connection factory will prefer SSL settings set via the
connector configuration vs system properties
```
that is .. no line breaks on the first line especially.
that would make it nicer on the git commit report.
> Add forceSSLParameters flag to core client to prefer local SSL properties
> over System properties
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1888
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Christopher L. Shannon
> Assignee: Christopher L. Shannon
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7.0
>
>
> When doing some testing I noticed that the order of precedence for setting
> SSL properties inside the core client NettyConnector is a bit backwards. Any
> javax.ssl property takes ultimate precedence and overrides a property that is
> set locally in the configuration map. This doesn't make sense to me and
> makes it so you can't override settings (ie in the same JVM have two
> different connections use different SSL settings if a global javax.ssl
> property is already set). There is a comment that mentions HORNETQ-680 as
> where this change was made so. I'm not sure what side effects this will have
> but I think this behavior is wrong and doesn't match how the 5.x client works.
> To fix this without breaking existing users, a new flag can be added called
> {{forceSSLParameters}} which will signal to prefer local SSL settings over
> any system property.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)