[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16497915#comment-16497915
 ] 

Gary Tully commented on AMQ-5129:
---------------------------------

it may still be no harm to introduce the scheduled executor even with a pool of 
one. It would ensure the thread stays alive but with the changes in AMQ-6979 it 
is less likely.

> Substitute TimeTask with ScheduledExecutorService in 
> org.apache.activemq.thread.Scheduler
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-5129
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5129
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Wish
>    Affects Versions: 5.9.0
>            Reporter: matteo rulli
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: proposed-patch.txt
>
>
> Since Timer has only one execution thread, long-running task can affect other 
> scheduled tasks. Besides, runtime exceptions thrown in TimerTasks kill the 
> only one running thread, bringing down the entire Scheduler.
> I have the suspect that all this could relate to AMQ-3938: sometimes in very 
> busy environments I experience exaclty the same problem: a slow leakeage due 
> to temp queues that are not deleted. Since 
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.RegionBroker uses a Scheduler to activate 
> the purgeInactiveDestinations, a crashed timer could explain why 
> purgeInactiveDestinations stops working.
> I attached a tentative patch to migrate timer to ScheduledExecutorService. 
> Hope this helps.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to